MedTrace Logo

SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY VERSUS OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

NCT06550856 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2024-08-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The present study will be conducted to assess whether there is a direct benefit associated with modified-Graham's omentopexy (MGO), above and beyond the benefit associated with Graham's omentopexy (GO) in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. We attempted to answer the question whether primary closure of the perforation in MGO will affect the outcome of surgery. Complication rates will be compared for the two alternative surgical procedures.

Conditions

  • Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Interventions

PROCEDURE

SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired using full thickness suture closure using 3/0 vicryl suture then omental patch laied over the sutures.

PROCEDURE

OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired by using omental patch without any attempt for primary closure of perforation.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sohag University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-07-15
Primary Completion
2025-05-01
Completion
2025-05-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06550856 on ClinicalTrials.gov