A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Extraperitoneal Stoma Creation Via the Arcuate Line Approach Versus Conventional Transperitoneal Stoma Formation for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
NCT07056868 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2025-07-09
Summary
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare two surgical techniques for stoma creation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The trial evaluates whether an extraperitoneal stoma created via the arcuate line approach can reduce the risk of developing parastomal hernia compared to the conventional transperitoneal stoma formation. Parastomal hernia is a common complication after stoma surgery, often requiring additional treatment or surgery. By testing a novel surgical route that avoids entering the abdominal cavity, this study aims to improve postoperative outcomes and quality of life for patients requiring a permanent stoma.
Conditions
- Parastomal Hernia
- Rectal Surgery
- Stoma Complications
- Extraperitoneal Stoma
- Surgical Technique Comparison
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
extraperitoneal colostomy
Patients in this group will undergo extraperitoneal stoma creation using the arcuate line approach. This technique involves creating a stoma through the extraperitoneal space by accessing the posterior sheath at or below the arcuate line, thereby avoiding direct peritoneal entry. The goal is to reduce the risk of parastomal hernia by maintaining abdominal wall integrity and preventing intra-abdominal content herniation around the stoma.
- PROCEDURE
-
transperitoneal colostomy
Patients in this group will receive a conventional transperitoneal stoma. In this approach, the stoma is brought out through the abdominal wall via a peritoneal opening, which is the standard method used in colorectal surgery. This technique serves as the control for evaluating whether the arcuate line approach offers improved outcomes, particularly in reducing parastomal hernia incidence.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2028-08-01
- Completion
- 2028-10-31
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05668130 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Short Stitch Versus Traditional Suture for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Open Hepatectomy
NCT04982653 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Stapler Reinforcement Patches Compared to Standard Staplers in Gastrojejunostomy
NCT06464978 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Purse String Versus Conventional Wound Closure Techniques in Children Undergoing Stoma Reversal
NCT07335835 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small-bite Versus Conventional Midline Fascial Closure in Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07340918 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Open, Closed, and Semi-close Hemorrhoidectomy.
NCT07196865 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bovine Reinforcement in Stomach, Colorectal and Lung Operation
NCT06968221 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Loop Ileostomy Closure:Stapled or Hand-sewn Anastomoses? Suture or Mesh Closure of the Stoma Site?
NCT02669992 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for High Risk Laparotomy Wounds. A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.
NCT03716687 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Stoma Reversal Wound Outcomes Between NPWT and Secondary Intention Healing
NCT07258134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Trial of Ostomy Closure Techniques
NCT01713452 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Evaluate Two Different Surgical Methods for Treatment for Abdominal Wall Diastasis
NCT01586741 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes Between Novel Tailored Transvaginal Mesh Surgery and Vaginal Native Tissue Repair Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT02465710 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Use of Post-operative NPWT Dressing in the Prevention of Infectious Complications After Ostomy Reversal Surgery
NCT04088162 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Emergency Intestinal Anastmosis
NCT07321743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videoconference in Stoma Out-patient Clinic
NCT01600508 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
COMPARISON OF PURSE-STRING CLOSURE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PRIMARY CLOSURE FOLLOWING STOMA REVERSAL TO REDUCE SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATE"
NCT04757623 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Different Solutions for Peristomal Skin Care in Patients With Pediatric Stoma
NCT05686902 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ostomy Primary Closure With 0.1% Betaine/Polyhexanide Wound Irrigation Compared to Pursestring Closure
NCT06309368 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse Repair
NCT00535301 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
NPWT vs Primary Closure in SSI Prevention for Emergency Laparotomies for Peritonitis
NCT05684198 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing on Wound Dehiscence and Infection After Abdominal Surgery
NCT07241507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Repair of Genitovesical Fistula in Females
NCT07043062 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Techniques for Umbilical Reconstruction
NCT02723409 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Need for Subcutaneous Wound Drains in Ileostomy Reversal
NCT01050686 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA