Open Wide Excision Versus Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease

NCT01241136 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2025-10-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In order to compare the early recurrence rates of pilonidal disease and overall patient satisfaction between procedures involving minimal and wide open excisions, we propose to perform a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing these two surgical procedures. Randomly assigned patients will undergo either 1) wide excisions of all pilonidal-diseased tissue (e.g. pits, cavity, sinus tracts), including a surrounding rim of normal tissue and left open to heal, or 2) minimal excisions of lined sinus tracts using varying sized trephines. Overall patient satisfaction will be evaluated by the amount of analgesic used for the procedure, the number of dressing changes, the length of convalescence, and overall patient tolerance of the procedures, both intra- and post-operatively. In addition, varying data points will be collected with the use of a quality of life survey and visual analog pain scale to analyze overall patient satisfaction. Patients will be followed for a period of two years following surgery to evaluate for early recurrence of their pilonidal disease.

Conditions

  • Pilonidal Disease

Interventions

PROCEDURE

open wide-excision pilonidal cystectomy

traditional open wide-excisional pilonidal cystectomy

PROCEDURE

minimal invasive pilonidal cystotomy

unroofing the cyst cavity and curettage the cyst

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • United States Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth

    lead FED

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
17 Years
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-02-19
Primary Completion
2014-11-25
Completion
2025-07-16

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01241136 on ClinicalTrials.gov