A Study Comparing Skin Adhesive With Staple for Surgical Incision Closure After Laparoscopic / Robotic Bowel Resection
NCT04969016 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 58
Last updated 2021-07-20
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Liquid skin adhesive (LSA) has benefits over other closure methods. Especially it is less invasive, quicker to apply, and better in cosmesis. Also LSA applied wounds need no post-care and its water-proof nature allows patients to take a shower immediate postoperative periods. While traditional sutures and skin staples are invasive and have infection chance requiring regular wound dressings, LSA is resistant against both water and microbial infection without need for postoperative dressings. Thus LSA-applied wounds need no professional care saving wound management cost.
This study investigated not only the safety and efficacy of LSA, but also the cost-effectiveness in the context of total wound management resources including man-power, time, and cost.
STUDY OBJECTIVE
Primary end point of this study is time requiring to manage surgical wound calculated as man hour. Secondary end points are wound related complication and cost for management of surgical wound.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The target number of the enrollment were calculated under the hypothesis that the wound management time for stapler group would be 1560 sec and that for LSA group be 264 sec with 10% drop-out rate. The sample number calculation formula of the t-test for independent 2 groups were used. For two-sided validation with the significance level of 0.05, and the power of 0.8, 29 patients for each group were estimated.
Conditions
- Benign or Malignant Diseases With Indication for Laparoscopic or Robotic Colorectal Resection
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
LSA (liquid skin adhesive)
surgical wound closure with liquid skin adhesive (LiquiBand®)
- PROCEDURE
-
stapler
surgical wound closure with stapler
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yonsei University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Byung Soh Min · Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-11-18
- Primary Completion
- 2021-10-22
- Completion
- 2021-10-22
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Abdominal Wall Closure With Triclosan-coated Suture (TCS09-10)
NCT01123616 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Suture vs Staples for Skin Closure After Liver Resection
NCT02046239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Permanent Versus Absorbable Colpopexy Trial
NCT02277925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Use of an Absorbable Coated Suture Material in Surgery (Safil)
NCT00645684 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sutures Versus Glue in Laparoscopic Port Site Closure.
NCT03843866 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy
NCT01907542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Triclosan-antibacterial Sutures Impact on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopic Surgeries.
NCT04255927 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of Replacing Buried Sutures With Tissue Adhesive on Aesthetic Outcome of Surgical Wounds.
NCT03425370 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery
NCT06586814 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Staples Versus Suture for Cesarean Wound Closure
NCT01008449 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT05112640 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT01509950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Versus Glue (Dermabond) Closure During Cesarean Delivery
NCT02831946 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Short Stitch Versus Traditional Suture for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Open Hepatectomy
NCT04982653 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
NCT02212977 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Harmonic Scalpel vs. Suture Ligation for Appendix Base During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07049965 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
NCT02547077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Random Comparison of LigaSure and Disposable Staples for Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT00487409 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimization of the Nursing Time After the Use of Tissue Adhesives During the Chest Port Placement on Patients Treated With Chemotherapy Versus Sutures
NCT04848389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Innovative Suture Technique for Endoscopic Hernia Incision
NCT05781932 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pain and Skin Closure Methods After Cesarean Section
NCT02028000 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Interest of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond®) in Closing Surgical Incisions in Children Before Acquisition of Continence
NCT00909805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes Comparing Different Methods of Skin Closure in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery.
NCT02936063 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Operative Time During the Use of the Synthetic Glue IFABONDTM in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03307824 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA