Comparing TCAF and MTUN With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Single Recessions in the Premandible
NCT07158541 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2025-09-16
Summary
Multiple techniques can be used for recession coverage. The most common techniques for single recessions are : tunnel technique (T) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) both combined with a palatal graft to provide sufficient gingival thickness. Recently two modifications have been described in literature, namely the tunneled coronally advanced flap and the modified tunnel. MTUN will function as the control group while people treated with the TCAF technique will function as the test group.
This randomized controlled trial compares MTUN and TCAF to determine which technique provides better root coverage for receding gums at single recession in the premandible. The main question it aims to answer is:
\- What is the average root coverage achieved with each technique in the short and long term? This may be clinically relevant because covering gum recession can reduce tooth sensitivity, improve aesthetics and make oral hygiene easier.
Researchers will compare the modified tunnel technique (MTUN = the gum is undermined) with the tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF = the gum is undermined, only partially detached and repositioned higher). In both techniques, a small piece of tissue is removed from the palate, which is used to cover the recession. The purpose of the connective tissue graft under the flap/tunnel, is to increase thickness and provide support. Pain associated to the material used to cover the donorsite will be seen as the secondary research question. The site will either be covered by spongostan and multiple stitches or a palatal stent.
Participants will:
* Undergo surgery (MTUN or TCAF, randomly assigned) to cover recessions
* Attend regular check-ups for up to 10 years after surgery
* Keep a postoperative journal (recording medication use, pain levels, tooth sensitivity, etc.)
Conditions
- Gingival Recession, Localized
- Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
- Gingival Recession
- Gingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
- Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
tunneled coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft
The gum at the recession site is undermined, only partially detached and reattached higher (combined withh a connective tissue graft).
- PROCEDURE
-
modified tunnel with connective tissue graft
At the recession site, the gingiva is undermined to create a tunnel, and a connective tissue graft is inserted through the sulcus into this space before advancing the flap coronally.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Ghent
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-25
- Primary Completion
- 2037-12-31
- Completion
- 2037-12-31
Countries
- Belgium
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Tunnel Technique and CAF With CTG in Mandibular Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT06135662 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laterally Closed Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT05823415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laterally Closed Tunnel VS Tunneling Technique in Recession Type 2
NCT03791554 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation Comparing Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap and Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Connective Tissue Graft for Managing Single Gum Recession
NCT07239180 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
NCT07064603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Connective Tissue Grafts Obtained With Two Different Methods in Root Coverage
NCT06373783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Flaps for Root Coverage
NCT02814279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap v.s Coronally Advanced Flap With Graft for Gingival Recession
NCT06553677 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
NCT05045586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Buccal Ginvigal Recessions With the Tunnel Technique in Conjunction With Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft. A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05436002 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tuberosity Versus Palatal Connective Tissue Graft on the Treatment of Single Maxillary Recession-type Defects
NCT06404762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Surgical Techniques With PRF in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT06986525 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recessions with Connective Tissue or Concentrated Growth Factor Membrane Using Tunnel Technique
NCT04561947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype.
NCT06432439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Techniques for Root Coverage With a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix
NCT02129504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Tunnel Technique and Free Gingival Graft in Gingival Recessions Treatment
NCT05270161 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Versus Tunnel for Soft Tissue Recession
NCT04513041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Surgical Approaches for Root Coverage of Teeth Presenting Gingival Recession and Non-carious Cervical Lesion
NCT03341598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Methods of Covering a Single Lower Front Tooth With Receded Gums
NCT06037161 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With a MCAF or a MCAT and a Collagen Matrix
NCT04225351 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft on Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With Tunnel Technique
NCT04291963 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of CAF + Mucograft® Compared to CAF Alone in Patients With Gingival Recessions
NCT00902876 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Subpithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Tunneling Technique in Treating RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT04104087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Gingival Recessions Treated by CAF with or Without PRF
NCT06591156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predetermination for Gingival Recession
NCT02479633 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA