Pinhole Versus Tunnel for Soft Tissue Recession

NCT04513041 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 21

Last updated 2026-02-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is an assessor-blinded split-mouth randomized clinical study to compare root coverage and gingival tissue thickness following two different surgical procedures for non-autologous grafting: the pinhole surgical technique (PST) and tunnel technique.

Conditions

  • Gingival Recession

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pinhole surgical technique and tunnel technique in a split mouth design

Each subject will have the each surgical procedure which are both considered routine minimally invasive clinical care for gingival recession. Gum recession on one side will receive Pinhole surgical technique (test procedure). The other side will receive Tunnel technique (control procedure), Research component involved is the capture of digital impression using intra-oral scanner in the baseline (preoperative) and the final visit (6 months postoperative).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mohanad Al-Sabbagh

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohanad Al-Sabbagh · University of Kentucky

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-06-25
Primary Completion
2024-08-06
Completion
2024-08-06

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04513041 on ClinicalTrials.gov