Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Connective Tissue Grafts Obtained With Two Different Methods in Root Coverage
NCT06373783 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2024-04-23
Summary
Gingival recession is a clinical problem that increases with age and affects patient comfort. It is defined as the displacement of the gingival margin to a more apical position of the cementum-enamel border of the tooth.
Coronally advanced flap (CAF) or tunnel technique (TUN) with subepithelial connective tissue procedures have been reported to be the most predictable methods of single gingival recession treatments. The ultimate goal of these plastic periodontal surgical procedures is to close the exposed root surface and achieve optimum aesthetic results. The main indications for root coverage (RC) procedures are aesthetic concern, root hypersensitivity, prevention of cervical abrasion and root caries, improvement of restorative results, and facilitation of plaque control. The use of a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCGT) combined with a coronally positioned flap is considered the gold standard by many authors for single gingival recession treatments.
De-epithelialization of free gingival grafts (DGG) has been proposed, especially when palatal tissue thickness is insufficient (≤2.5 mm) and larger graft size in the apico-coronal or mesio-distal directions is required. In this technique, the graft of the required width and length is separated from the lateral side of the palate, and then the 0.3-0.5 mm thick epithelial layer of the resulting graft is cut from the connective tissue layer.
Ultrasonography (USG) is based on the principle of recording data obtained as a result of ultrasound waves sent with the help of a probe hitting and reflecting on substances of different densities. This technique is widely used in medical practice. In dentistry, the USG method is used to measure the alveolar bone level and the dimensions of the periodontium to evaluate the gingival thickness. It also has functions to evaluate color power and color speed, as well as blood flow.
The study hypothesizes that combining SCGT and DGG with a coronally positioned flap could yield different clinical outcomes in patients with a single buccal gingival recession. This study aims to compare the clinical success of connective tissue grafts obtained by two different surgical methods in covering the root surface with ultrasonography (USG).
Conditions
- Gingival Recession, Localized
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
subepithelial connective tissue graft
The area where the gingival recession occurred was prepared with the modified coronally positioned flap technique developed by Zuchelli. The subepithelial connective tissue graft was obtained in each patient using the single incision technique from the region between the mesial of the canine and the mesial of the first molar in the palate. Connective tissue dimensions were approximately 10x5x2 mm. The graft thickness was measured with an endodontic spreader from 3 points (mesial, buccal, and distal) and an electronic caliper during surgery.
- PROCEDURE
-
de- epithelize gingival graft
The area where the gingival recession occurred was prepared with the modified coronally positioned flap technique developed by Zuchelli. A shallow horizontal incision was made at ≈3 mm apical from the gingival margin of the maxillary molar teeth using a number 15 scalpel blade. Subsequently, a parallel horizontal incision, at ≈ 4 mm apical from the first horizontal incision, was traced in conjunction with two vertical releasing incisions to delineate a rectangular area. Then, the uppermost epithelial layer was scraped off using a size 11 scalpel tip. The connective tissue graft to be taken from the palate area was 10x5x2 mm in size, and the graft thickness was measured with an endodontic spreader from 3 points (mesial, buccal, and distal) and electronic caliper during surgery.
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
ultrasonography
Clinical parameter measurements (probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession depth and width, keratinized tissue width and height) were taken on the day of surgery, the 3rd days, the 14th days, the 1st month, the 3rd months and the 6th months. Ultrasonography measurements A 6-18 MHz intraoral probe was used in intraoral USG examinations. Sterile gel was applied to the intraoral probe and covered with a stretch film. Then, it was placed directly on the mucosal surface of the receiver site in the buccal area. Mucosal thickness was evaluated using the B-mode of the device, and vascularization was evaluated using the color doppler and pulsed wave doppler modes of the device. The following equation is used and calculated by US unit pulsatility index (PI) = (Vmax-Vmin) (Vmean) (Vmax is peak systolic flow velocity. Vmin is diastolic flow velocity and Vmean is mean flow velocity.) The mean PI values of each patient were measured.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Pamukkale University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
GİZEM TORUMTAY CİN, assist prof. · PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY FACULTY of DENTISTIRY
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-15
- Completion
- 2024-03-16
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
NCT05923294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tuberosity Versus Palatal Connective Tissue Graft on the Treatment of Single Maxillary Recession-type Defects
NCT06404762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession-type Defects Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT02788266 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession With Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT06646432 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Flaps for Root Coverage
NCT02814279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Growth Factors in the Treatment of the Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05319938 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing TCAF and MTUN With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Single Recessions in the Premandible
NCT07158541 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Connective Tissue Graft Position
NCT04181892 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft
NCT06366022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Outcomes of Tunnel Technique
NCT04016493 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Subpithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Tunneling Technique in Treating RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT04104087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Hyaluronic Acid With Connective Tissue Grafting for Gingival Recession
NCT07291583 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
NCT06044870 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Tunnel Technique and CAF With CTG in Mandibular Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT06135662 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Tuberosity Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06650072 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
NCT05045586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04109794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT04611282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Evaluation Clinical Results of Coronally Advanced Flap With Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT04942821 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap v.s Coronally Advanced Flap With Graft for Gingival Recession
NCT06553677 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Free Gingival Graft on Root Closure
NCT05604391 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single Stage Root Coverage for Gingival Recession With or Without Free Gingival Graft
NCT03370042 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Techniques for Root Coverage With a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix
NCT02129504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Palatal Wound Healing
NCT06118177 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laterally Closed Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT05823415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA