MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Flaps for Root Coverage

NCT02814279 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42

Last updated 2020-05-15

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare clinical, esthetic and patient-centered outcomes of coronally advanced tunnel (TUN) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) both associated with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of gingival recession.

Conditions

  • Gingival Recession

Interventions

PROCEDURE

CAF plus connective tissue graft

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the trapezoidal flap associated with connective tissue graft.

PROCEDURE

Tunnel plus connective tissue graft

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the tunnel flap associated with connective tissue graft.

DRUG

Sodium dipyrone

All participants were instructed to take 500 mg sodium dipyrone just in case of pain.

DRUG

chlorhexidine rinse

All participants were instructed to perform 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse after the surgical procedures.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mauro P Santamaria, PhD · ICT-UNESP

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-02-28
Primary Completion
2015-10-31
Completion
2015-10-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02814279 on ClinicalTrials.gov