The Tunnel Technique and Free Gingival Graft in Gingival Recessions Treatment
NCT05270161 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2024-05-08
Summary
The present study aims to compare the tunnel technique/laterally closed tunnel technique and the FGG technique in the treatment of isolate/multiple GR in the anterior region of the mandible. Furthermore, it is proposed to evaluate the effect of a gel based on hyaluronic acid and green tea on the healing of the donor area after the removal of FGG from the palate. This work is expected to contribute to the still uncertain literature on the effectiveness of the tunnel technique as an alternative to the use of FGG in the treatment of multiple GR in the mandible.
Conditions
- Gingival Recession
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Tunnel technique
Intrasulcular incisions on the buccal surface were made using a n°15 C blade, preserving the integrity of the papillae. The incision was extended to the adjacent tooth on both sides of the multiple recessions. Dissection of the entire buccal aspect was performed as a partial-thickness flap using sharp tunnel elevators preserving the papillae. The flap was extended beyond the mucogingival junction and under each papilla allowing a tension-free flap mobilization in the coronal direction. The connective tissue graft was placed in the tunnel and was stabilized using absorbable suspensory sutures. The mobilized mucous flap was advanced coronally to the cemento enamel junction, and suspensory sutures were stitched.
- PROCEDURE
-
Laterally closed tunnel technique
Intrasulcular incisions on the buccal surface were made using a n°15 C blade, preserving the integrity of the papillae. The tunnel elevators were mobilized apically beyond the mucogingival line and extended medially and distally from the recession defect by undermining the facial surface of the interdental papillae. The insertion of muscles and fibers must be removed until a tension-free flap is obtained in the mesial, apical and distal directions. The preparation of the flap will be done carefully to avoid rupture of the papillae and perforation of the flap. As a result of this procedure, the mesial and distal margins of the flap must be brought together without tension to cover the exposed part of the root surface. The connective tissue graft was placed in the tunnel and was fixed mesially and distally at the inner aspect of the flap. Margins of the flap were pulled together over the graft and sutured with interrupted sutures.
- PROCEDURE
-
Free gingival graft
In the recipient area, a marginal horizontal linear incision will be made in the mucogingival junction with a n°15 C blade, creating a partial thickness flap, keeping the periosteum intact. The horizontal dimension of the receiving area will be determined according to the mesiodistal extension of the area without keratinized gingiva. All mobile soft tissues, including epithelium, connective tissue and muscle fibers will be removed from the donor area using scissors to ensure stability in the recipient area. The connective tissue graft will be obtained by the free gingival graft technique and will be sutured in the recipient area.
- PROCEDURE
-
Gingival graft - donor area
The connective tissue graft will be obtained by the free gingival graft technique for all groups (T1, T2, T3 and T4). The mold of the prepared receiving area will be performed using sterile aluminum foil. The mold will be transferred to the donor area on the palate and the edges of the mold delimited with a scalpel blade. Deeper incisions will be made on the edges with the scalpel perpendicular to the palate, aiming to obtain a graft approximately 1.5 mm thick. With the scalpel blade parallel, the graft will be removed (epithelium and connective graft) maintaining its uniform thickness. For T1 and T2, the free gingival graft will be de-epithelialized. In donor area, a hyaluronic acid gel and green tea will be applied by the participant 3 times a day for 7 days (gel group) or no material will be placed in the donor area and the clot will be kept in position by means of sutures (clot group).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidade Federal de Alfenas
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Suzane C Pigossi, PhD · Alfenas Federal University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-11-05
- Primary Completion
- 2025-11-05
- Completion
- 2025-11-05
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Modified Free Gingival Graft and Conventional Free Gingival Graft on Gingival Recession
NCT06737120 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession With Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT06646432 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Versus Tunnel for Soft Tissue Recession
NCT04513041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of SECTG Vs. Laser-DGG in Management of Gingival Recessions.
NCT04133298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Free Gingival Graft on Root Closure
NCT05604391 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laterally Closed Tunnel VS Tunneling Technique in Recession Type 2
NCT03791554 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Different Tunneling Technique for Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Matertial
NCT06065774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tunnel vs. CAF for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05122468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Tunnel Approach in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT02642887 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Outcomes of Tunnel Technique
NCT04016493 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Free Gingival Graft Versus Connective Tissue Graft
NCT05563428 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Tunnel Technique and CAF With CTG in Mandibular Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT06135662 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Inverted T-shape Free Gingival Graft for Treatment of RT2 / RT3 Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06615687 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Time Effect on the Predictability of Different Grafting for Gingival Recession RT 1
NCT05976451 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Linear Incision for Connective Tissue
NCT06365983 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
NCT05045586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04109794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects Using a New Xenogenic Collagen Membrane Compared to Connective Tissue Graft: a Randomized Controlled Split-mouth Clinical Study
NCT04800250 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laterally Closed Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT05823415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing TCAF and MTUN With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Single Recessions in the Premandible
NCT07158541 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of the Modified Free Gingival Graft Technique
NCT06580821 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Creeping Technique (GCT) in Treating Gingival Recession
NCT05101642 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Root Coverage of Gingival Recessions
NCT02980055 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Connective Tissue Grafts Obtained With Two Different Methods in Root Coverage
NCT06373783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA