Continuous Versus Demand-Based Oxygen in Patients With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

NCT06767904 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-01-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this randomised clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of exertional oxygen delivery by continous versus demand-based flow systems in patients with fibrotic Interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . The main questions it aim to answer:

Is there a difference in lowest oxygen saturation? Is there a difference in saturation: time below \<90%, pulse rate, distance and patient preferences ? It is a cross over study, so all patients will test both methods. Participants will perform 2 6-minute walk tests with the two different oxygen delivery systems.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Continous Oxygen by Bottles

Oxygen delivery by bottles giving a continous flow.

DEVICE

Demand oxygen by Portable Concentrator

Oxygen delivery by consentrators, giving oxygen only when inhaling.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sissel Kronborg-White

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sissel Kronborg-White, MD, PhD · Aarhus University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-03-01
Primary Completion
2026-08-31
Completion
2027-02-28

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06767904 on ClinicalTrials.gov