MedTrace Logo

Prospective Study Comparing Different Modalities of Oxygen Delivery During Assessment of Functional Exercise Capacity

NCT00484562 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 39

Last updated 2016-10-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Objectives:

The objective of this study is to determine if any differences exist between the varying modes of portable oxygen delivery systems including liquid oxygen, a portable concentrator, portable devices filled at home from a concentrator, and medical grade compressed oxygen (either an M6 size or D size cylinder).

Hypothesis:

Patients who are prescribed LTOT will show similar physiologic responses to exercise when using differing modalities of portable oxygen delivery systems.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Standard oxygen delivery system

Standard oxygen tank with pulse dose regulator

DEVICE

Homefill oxygen delivery system

Homefill oxygen delivery system, pre-filled from a larger oxygen concentrator base unit.

DEVICE

Helios oxygen delivery system

Liquid oxygen portable system pre-filled from a larger liquid oxygen tank

DEVICE

FreeStyle oxygen system

portable battery-powered oxygen concentrator delivery system

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tyco Healthcare Group

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • University of Missouri-Columbia

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Shawna L Strickland, MEd · University of Missouri-Columbia

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-05-31
Primary Completion
2006-09-30
Completion
2006-09-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00484562 on ClinicalTrials.gov