Comparison of Two Oxygen Setting During Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

NCT02563314 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1

Last updated 2019-06-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Hypoxaemic patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at some risk of carbon dioxide (CO2) retention during oxygen therapy. Main mechanism of CO2 retention is believed to be reversal of preexisting regional hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, resulting in a greater dead space. Risk of CO2 retention during mechanical ventilation remains controversial. Thus recent study suggested limited risk of CO2 retention with controlled oxygen supplementation during mechanical ventilation. Conversely, controlled oxygen supplementation might decrease dyspnea and respiratory workload, increase comfort and improve both urinary output and renal function.

Conditions

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Acute Exacerbation, Unspecified

Interventions

DEVICE

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation - Normoxia

Maintenance of an oxygen setting allowing normal oxygen saturation during non-invasive mechanical ventilation (SpO2 targeted 96-98%)

DEVICE

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation - Controlled hypoxemia

Maintenance of an oxygen setting allowing mild hypoxemia during non-invasive mechanical ventilation (SpO2 targeted 88-92%)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Michael DARMON, MD PhD · CHU de SAINT-ETIENNE

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-03-22
Primary Completion
2018-09-24
Completion
2018-09-24

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02563314 on ClinicalTrials.gov