MedTrace Logo

Resin-Cement Type Influence on Cement Remnants in Implant-Supported Restorations

NCT06711237 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-12-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study quantitatively compared cement residues of two resin cement types around implant-supported restorations (ISR) with a crown-abutment margin located at the gingival level. This prospective, single-blinded, cross-over clinical trial compared optically detectable cement remnants between Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (RC) and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC).

Conditions

  • Dental Cements

Interventions

OTHER

self-adhesive resin cement (RC)

Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a self-adhesive resin cement (RC). Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.

OTHER

resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC)

Single-unit implant-supported single crowns were cemented to the abutments using a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). Residual cement was removed, and the restorations were retrieved for analysis of cement remnants.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Harvard School of Dental Medicine

    collaborator OTHER

  • Vilniaus Implantologijos Centro (VIC) Klinika

    lead NETWORK

Principal Investigators

  • Eglė Vindašiūtė-Narbutė · Vilnius Implantology Center

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
SEQUENTIAL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-01
Primary Completion
2022-03-01
Completion
2022-09-01

Countries

  • Lithuania

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06711237 on ClinicalTrials.gov