Airway Flow of RAM Cannula With BCPAP in Infants
NCT06697912 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2025-06-25
Summary
The RAM Cannula interface is used as routine interface for newborn infants receiving CPAP treatment for respiratory distress. Compared to the standard systems that have been used for more than 50 years, the interface has high resistance and has not been extensively studied. The delivered quality of the CPAP support is likely to be negatively affected by the interface resistance.
We hypothesise that exhalations through the device is uncommon and that the interface resistance restricts flow from the patient. If expiratory flows are uncommon the RAM interface provide support clinically comparable to other systems based on unidirectional flow such as humidified high-flow cannula.
This is a cross-sectional, observational study (no intervention) in newborn infants that are clinically stable and on respiratory support with the RAM interface connected to a bCPAP circuit. This is the most common support in the Phu San neonatal unit. The time needed for data collection is short and collection is expected to take approximately five minutes (less than 15 minutes) in a quiet infant. The collection can be planned to minimize disturbances for the infant, parents and staff. For example, the busiest times of the day can be avoided to not intervene with daily care, ward rounds or examinations of the infant.
Data on flow and pressure will be collected within the respiratory support circuit at the connection to the RAM interface. The measurements are passive, and no tests or manipulation of the infant is planned. There will be brief interruptions (\<1 min) in respiratory support when the meters are connected. Similar interruptions are very common and occurs several times per day during normal care.
Data will be collected in case report forms (CRF) with REDCap electronic data capture tool. All personal identifiers will be removed before data export from REDCap and further analysis only using enrolment numbers.
Background variables describing the pregnancy, delivery and the infant will be collected. We also will record details of the RAM-cannula interface, such as size, protective dressing, gastric feeding tube, obvious leak at nares and mouth.
During the measurement the infant will be monitored for vital signs and any problems will be addressed and recorded. This includes oxygen need, CPAP support and breathing problems. The flow and pressure data for one minute of quiet breathing will be stored locally with the enrolment number as identifier. The analysis after collection of flow and pressure will include average flow in the CPAP circuit, the flow to the patient, average absolute leak and delivered pressure. If a variation with breathing can be seen this will be described. These output variables directly relate to the research questions.
1. What flows and pressure can be observed in the breathing circuit? \[Measured average flows, pressure and variability between patients\]
2. Do infants exhale through the RAM interface? \[Measured expiratory flows at the interface\]
3. What is the level of leak for the interface? \[Measured absolute leak\]
The RAM cannula interface has been widely introduced but is not CE-marked for CPAP support. It has an advantage of being more comfortable and light weight with less nasal injury in most trials. The high resistance of the RAM interface has been discussed as problematic by several authors, but the clinical importance is not known. Comparing RAM interface to other CPAP interfaces in clinical trials is difficult and, if RAM has a treatment effect similar to HHFNC, very large trials of high quality would be needed.
The described study will generate new knowledge on the RAM interface by describing patient flow through the interface and illustrate the importance of resistance and leak. The study is not strictly a physiological study but investigate flow in an airway interface. The most likely outcome is that exhalation is uncommon, and this would support that the RAM interface has more similarities with HHFNC than conventional CPAP.
Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- Infant, Premature, Diseases
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 0 Hours
- Max Age
- 3 Months
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-11-19
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-01
- Completion
- 2025-06-01
Countries
- Vietnam
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Delivered by Two Different Modalities on Breathing Pattern in Preterm Infants
NCT01326975 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Cpap for Initial Respiratory Stabilisation of Very Premature Infants
NCT06543589 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Establishing Functional Residual Capacity During Newborn Resuscitation on Oxygenation
NCT00531102 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Bubble Nasal CPAP for the Treatment of Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn in Infants ≥ 35 Weeks Gestation
NCT01270581 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Novel Low Cost Bubble CPAP as an Alternative Respiratory Support in Low Resource Setting
NCT06082674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Infant Pulmonary Mechanics: High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal CPAP
NCT01939067 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparison of Two Nasal Interface for CPAP in Preterm
NCT03212508 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HFNC and NCPAP in Extremely Preterm Infants
NCT03649282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal High CPAP Pressures in Preterm Neonates Post-extubation
NCT05230485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Delivery Systems of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonates
NCT06038565 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) on Oral Feeding in Human Neonates
NCT01237015 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) With Conventional CPAP for Extubation in Preterm Infants
NCT00979433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Respiratory Physiology During High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment in Preterm Neonates.
NCT02200900 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilator Assist or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants
NCT04333563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Monitoring Neonatal Resuscitation Trial
NCT03256578 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Uninterrupted Infant Respiratory Support Treatment
NCT04244890 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Changes in Respiratory Effort in Preterm Infants
NCT02014493 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Evaluate the Use of the Neotech RAM Nasal Cannula for CPAP and Bi-PAP Application in Infants 28-42 Weeks Gestation in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
NCT04096235 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
NCT05849116 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Successful Extubation and Noninvasive Ventilation in Preterm ≤ 1500g Terms
NCT02396693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Flow Magnitude on Cardiorespiratory Stability During Nasal High Flow Therapy in Preterm Infants
NCT05908227 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ventilator Weaning Outcome Between NIV-NAVA and Nasal CPAP (or IMV ) Modes in Premature Neonates
NCT04118400 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Comparative Study Between Postextubation of Preterm Infants Into High-Flow Nasal Cannulae V.S Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
NCT04051762 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Non-invasive Support in Extremely Preterm Infants
NCT02723123 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in Preterm Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
NCT06966752 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA