Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates

NCT02168257 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8

Last updated 2017-07-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the RAM cannula is as effective as conventional binasal prongs to deliver CPAP to low birth weight infants with respiratory distress.

Conditions

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
  • Low Birth Weight Infants

Interventions

DEVICE

RAM Cannula

DEVICE

Binasal Prong CPAP

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Neil P Mulrooney, MD · Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

  • Andrea L Lampland, MD · Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-06-30
Primary Completion
2017-02-28
Completion
2017-02-28

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02168257 on ClinicalTrials.gov