MedTrace Logo

A Comparative Study Between Postextubation of Preterm Infants Into High-Flow Nasal Cannulae V.S Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

NCT04051762 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2019-08-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators hypothesize that there is a growing trend of the feasibility of HFNC as an alternative to other forms of non-invasive ventilation mechanism to provide continuous distending pressure to preterm infants. However, there remains uncertainty about the efficacy and safety of HFNC in this population.

Conditions

  • Neonatal Respiratory Distress

Interventions

DEVICE

High flow nasal cannula vs. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure

High flow nasal cannula

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ramy Saleh Morsy

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Day
Max Age
28 Days
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-06-01
Primary Completion
2018-05-30
Completion
2018-07-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04051762 on ClinicalTrials.gov