Comparing of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Cpap for Initial Respiratory Stabilisation of Very Premature Infants
NCT06543589 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 443
Last updated 2024-11-12
Summary
Non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) stabilizes premature newborns, but its optimal pressure is unknown. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an alternative that minimizes trigeminal stimulation but lacks precise pressure control. Initial studies show HFNC's feasibility and effectiveness. This study hypothesizes that HFNC can deliver adequate pressure, reduce the need for positive pressure ventilation, and support safe stabilization of very premature infants. The trial compares the effectiveness and safety of HFNC versus CPAP in the delivery room and during transport to the neonatal intensive care unit in very premature infants. The primary objective is to compare HFNC and CPAP in reducing the need for positive pressure ventilation in very premature infants immediately after birth. The study includes very premature infants delivered between 28+0 and 31+6 weeks gestation in 10 tertiary referral centers (nine in the Czech Republic, one in Slovakia). Approximately 443 patients are required to detect a 15% relative decrease in the need for positive pressure ventilation between trial groups. Centers will be randomized to either CPAP or HFNC at each time period, with parental consent obtained before birth. The primary endpoint is the proportion of neonates requiring positive pressure ventilation within the first 10 minutes post-birth.
Conditions
- Premature; Infant
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
High-flow-nasal-cannula
Respiratory support will be provided by devices that deliver a blend of heated and humidified gas mixture of air and oxygen at gas flows exceeding 8 L/ min via binasal cannula.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Charles University, Czech Republic
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SEQUENTIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 1 Minute
- Max Age
- 5 Minutes
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-31
- Completion
- 2026-09-30
More Related Trials
-
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
NCT01531465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between Postextubation of Preterm Infants Into High-Flow Nasal Cannulae V.S Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
NCT04051762 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing HHHFNC and nCPAP Ventilation Methods for the Prevention of Extubation Failure in Preterm Infants
NCT02887846 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Infant Pulmonary Mechanics: High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal CPAP
NCT01939067 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Premature Newborns Treated With Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Under Heated Humidified High-flow
NCT06398691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Changes in Respiratory Effort in Preterm Infants
NCT02014493 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Pressure During Nasal High Flow and CPAP in Neonates
NCT02632799 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula to Nasal CPAP in Neonates
NCT00609882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Support of Preterm Neonates
NCT04238273 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
nHFOV Versus nCPAP in Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn
NCT03006354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
HHHFNC (Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula) Versus NCPAP for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity
NCT02570217 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nasal HFOV Versus Nasal CPAP to Reduce Post-extubation pCO2
NCT02340299 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Delivered by Two Different Modalities on Breathing Pattern in Preterm Infants
NCT01326975 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy and Tolerance of High Flow Nasal Cannula for Respiratory Distress Syndrom in Late Preterms (34-36 Weeks)
NCT02958488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oscillatory Versus Non-oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support
NCT03711565 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal High CPAP Pressures in Preterm Neonates Post-extubation
NCT05230485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Crossover Comparison of Tidal Volume Delivery During Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Preterm Infants: Infant Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Prongs
NCT04326270 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-invasive Ventilation With Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure in Premature Infants
NCT01624012 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Nasal High Flow From Birth in Premature Infants - a Pilot Study
NCT01991886 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cardiorespiratory Effects of Nasal High Frequency Ventilation in Neonates
NCT05706428 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Results of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen Pressure in Premature Neonates Who Underwent MIST Under HHHFNC or Nasal CPAP Methods
NCT04505176 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Nasal High Frequency in Preterm Neonates
NCT06687083 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Determining an Optimal Weaning Method of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Neonates
NCT02064712 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
nHFOV vs nCPAP: Effects on Gas Exchange for the Treatment of Neonates Recovering From RDS
NCT02772835 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
NCT05849116 ·Status: UNKNOWN