Comparing of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Cpap for Initial Respiratory Stabilisation of Very Premature Infants

NCT06543589 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 443

Last updated 2024-11-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) stabilizes premature newborns, but its optimal pressure is unknown. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an alternative that minimizes trigeminal stimulation but lacks precise pressure control. Initial studies show HFNC's feasibility and effectiveness. This study hypothesizes that HFNC can deliver adequate pressure, reduce the need for positive pressure ventilation, and support safe stabilization of very premature infants. The trial compares the effectiveness and safety of HFNC versus CPAP in the delivery room and during transport to the neonatal intensive care unit in very premature infants. The primary objective is to compare HFNC and CPAP in reducing the need for positive pressure ventilation in very premature infants immediately after birth. The study includes very premature infants delivered between 28+0 and 31+6 weeks gestation in 10 tertiary referral centers (nine in the Czech Republic, one in Slovakia). Approximately 443 patients are required to detect a 15% relative decrease in the need for positive pressure ventilation between trial groups. Centers will be randomized to either CPAP or HFNC at each time period, with parental consent obtained before birth. The primary endpoint is the proportion of neonates requiring positive pressure ventilation within the first 10 minutes post-birth.

Conditions

  • Premature; Infant

Interventions

DEVICE

High-flow-nasal-cannula

Respiratory support will be provided by devices that deliver a blend of heated and humidified gas mixture of air and oxygen at gas flows exceeding 8 L/ min via binasal cannula.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Charles University, Czech Republic

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
SEQUENTIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Minute
Max Age
5 Minutes
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-12-31
Primary Completion
2026-05-31
Completion
2026-09-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06543589 on ClinicalTrials.gov