Assessment of Treatment Efficacy Using Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach Versus MBT Chart Method for Bracket Positioning
NCT06652230 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2024-10-22
Summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) versus MBT chart method for bracket positioning on orthodontic treatment results.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is there a difference in orthodontic treatment results between smile arc marginal ridge approach (SAMRA) and MBT chart method for bracket positioning?
Does SAMRA provide more accurate orthodontic results and reduce the number of archwire bendings and brackets repositioning needed during finishing?
The investigators will compare Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) with MBT Chart Method (gold standard) to see if SAMRA provides more accurate orthodontic results and reduce the need for archwire bendings and brackets repositioning during finishing.
Participants will:
* Undergo orthodontic treatment and divided into two groups, Group A (SAMRA) and Group B (MBT Chart Method).
* 0.018-inch MBT brackets will be used in both groups.
* Follow ups every 1 month will take place to change the archwires after becoming passive.
* After leveling and alignment is completed, orthodontic treatment results, number of archwire bendings and brackets repositioning needed will be determined to see which type of intervention is better or if both provide similar results.
Conditions
- Class I Malocclusion
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA)
Smile Arc Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) is a new orthodontic bonding technique proposed by Dr. Dalia El Bokle where she stated that it provides more accurate orthodontic results and less time and effort needed during finished. No randomized clinical trials are done on this new approach yet so our study is the first one to test it. 0.018-inch MBT brackets will be used in our study.
- OTHER
-
MBT Chart Method
For our comparator group MBT Chart Method will be used. Using charts during orthodontic bonding procedures is considered the gold standard. 0.018-inch brackets will be used.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 11 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-08-31
- Completion
- 2025-08-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Maxillary Versus Bi-Maxillary Posterior Segments Intrusion Adult Subjects With Skeletal Open Bite
NCT04713280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Alignment Achieved Using Computer-guided Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets to Conventional Appliance Placement
NCT02221856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction Using 0.018-inch Versus 0.022-inch Slot Brackets in Adults
NCT04468295 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of an AI Prediction Model of Facial Changes After Orthodontic Treatment of Patients With Bimaxillary Protrusion
NCT07066423 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
NCT04988373 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Different Commercial Bracket Brands
NCT05333094 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries
NCT07311785 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Protocol of Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)
NCT05489302 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectives of Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment of Angle Class I Malocclusion
NCT06638983 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
SmartArch vs Super Elastic NiTi Aligning Archwires
NCT05510206 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
NCT06232928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Different Orthodontic Tooth Movements During Clear Aligner Therapy
NCT06276985 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Damon vs MBT Braces: Patient Compliance and Treatment Efficiency
NCT07185087 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction
NCT05150665 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printed Orthodontic Molar Distalizer
NCT07191158 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Micro-osteoperforations on Lower Anterior Crowding Using Clear Aligners
NCT07169968 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bio-creative Therapy for En Masse Retraction of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth
NCT03239275 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Clear Aligners Vs Conventional Fixed Appliance's Impact on Muscular Activities Among Adults Using SEMG (Surface Electromyography)
NCT06699290 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Canine Retraction Using Different Bracket Slots' Sizes
NCT05361863 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA