Comparative Study of the House Advancement Flap, Rhomboid Flap, and Y-V Anoplasty
NCT00883571 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2009-12-29
Summary
This prospective randomized study included 60 consecutive patients suffering from anal stenosis in the period from April 2002 to December 2008. They admitted to colorectal surgery unit, Mansoura university hospital, Egypt. According to the classification proposed by Milson and Mazier(5), all patients had moderate to severe anal stenosis. There were 43 males and 17 female with a mean age 34 + 5.2 years ranging from 18 up to 63 years.
Conditions
- Anal Stenosis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
house advancement flap group
A house flap of healthy tissue was incised to the depth of ischiorectal fat. The flap consisted of skin and subcutaneous tissue. The flap was sufficiently mobilized without undermining its fatty base containing perforating blood vessels. The flap should be loose and easily advanced into the anal canal. When the ''base'' of this house-shaped flap was advanced into the anal canal defect, it was fixed to the top of the excised area with 3/0 Vicryl sutures.
- PROCEDURE
-
Rhomboid flap GROUP
A rhomboid flap was incised in ischeorectal fossa and was mobilized without undermining of its fatty base into the anal canal so that the tip of rhomboid flap is sutured to the top of stricured area using vicryl 3/0.
- PROCEDURE
-
Y-V anoplasty GROUP
Y-V anoplastyis performed by making a v shaped incision in the perianal skin posteriorly starting from the lower end of the wound resultant from excision of scared area. A V-shaped flap is then dissected with preservation fatty base .The V flap is then advanced into the anal canal so that its tip is sutured to the top of structured area using vicryel 3/0.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
mohamed yousef · Mansoura University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 66 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2002-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2008-12-31
- Completion
- 2008-12-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Study Between Delorme Operation With or Without Postanal Repair in Treatment of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT01656369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair
NCT00830661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Delorme's Operation in Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT02601326 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rerouting Seton Versus LIFT for Complex Anal Fistula
NCT04616911 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele
NCT02659176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Track (LIFT) Versus Fistulectomy in Trans-sphincteric Anal Ffistula.
NCT04351074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Inter-sphincteric Fistula Tract for Management of Anal Fistula
NCT05314205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Drainage Seton With Flap Versus EAS Preserving Seton in Treatment of Transsphincteric Anal Fistula
NCT03983174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoidectomy With or Without Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in Management of Patients With Hemorrhoids
NCT06884774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug Versus Advancement Flap Surgery
NCT01021774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Versus Lateral Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy for the Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT06559085 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transperineal Repair of Primary Obstetric Rectovaginal Fistulas
NCT04267757 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Posterolateral Versus Lateral Internal Anal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissure
NCT03426449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TROPIS Versus Coring Out Fistulectomy in High Anal Fistula
NCT07334678 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Treatment of Complex Anal Fistulas
NCT02585167 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of a Slotted Anoscope That Facilitates Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT01264835 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Versus Horizontal Plicataion in Transperienal Repair of Rectocele
NCT04502953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) Versus Fistula-tract Laser Closure (Filac) Versus Conventional Seton in the Management of Anal Fistula
NCT04418323 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Anal Fistula Plug Versus Endorectal Advancement Flap
NCT01931371 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fistulectomy and Primary Sphincter rEconstruction vs. endorectaL Advancement Flap in the Treatment of High Anal Fistulas
NCT04119700 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Video-assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Versus Seton in the Management of High Peri Anal Fistula
NCT02313597 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Modified Clipped-LIFT Procedure for High Transsphincteric or Suprasphincteric Fistula
NCT07102134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT on LIFT Versus Modified Parks Technique Versus Two-Stage Seton
NCT04377542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Anal Sphincter Reconstruction After High Recurrent Anorectal Fistula Excision
NCT04357210 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Parental Attitudes to Neoanus Dilatations Post-reconstruction in Anorectal Malformations
NCT05749406 ·Status: UNKNOWN