MedTrace Logo

Comparison Of Implant Position Achieved With Fully Guided Versus Partially Guided Implant Placement

NCT06519383 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2024-07-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Globally implant therapy is currently accepted as a predictable, viable and successful option to replace missing teeth. Ample studies have shown excellent survival and clinical success rates of dental implants for various indications.The correct three-dimensional (3D) positioning of an implant is considered a prerequisite for an optimal outcome.Computer assisted implant surgery maybe beneficial in patients with limited bone and proximity to anatomic structures.Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to investigate the accuracy of implant position achieved with static CAIP(Computer Assisted Implant Placement) and to compare this with the accuracy of conventional cast based partially guided implant placement(cPGIP).

Conditions

  • Implant Placement

Interventions

PROCEDURE

guided implant surgery

Surgical guide is fabricated and fitted onto the patient's arch and implant is placed with guide in place.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-07-31
Primary Completion
2025-08-31
Completion
2025-08-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06519383 on ClinicalTrials.gov