MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of High-flow Nasal Oxygen and Conventional Nasal Cannula in Monitored Anesthesia Care for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

NCT06688019 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2024-11-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection places patients at risk of desaturation, and high-flow nasal oxygen may reduce the risk. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of high-flow nasal oxygen during endoscopic submucosal dissection. We will compare the incidence of hypoxemia (defined as SpO2 lower than 90%) of conventional nasal oxygen cannula group and that of high-flow humidified oxygen-delivery system group during the procedure.

Conditions

  • Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Interventions

DEVICE

high-flow humidified oxygen-delivery system (OptiFlow THRIVE)

conventional oxygenation arm will receive oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula, while Optiflow THRIVE arm will receive oxygen at 50 L/min via Optiflow THRIVE during the procedure.

DEVICE

conventional oxygenation (nasal cannula)

conventional oxygenation arm will receive oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula, while Optiflow THRIVE arm will receive oxygen at 50 L/min via Optiflow THRIVE during the procedure.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Yonsei University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-11-30
Primary Completion
2025-10-18
Completion
2025-10-18

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06688019 on ClinicalTrials.gov