Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT02728427 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2018-04-26
Summary
Compared with traditional open proctectomy, laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, earlier recovery, and better cosmetic outcome, and its long-term oncologic outcomes have been demonstrated. However, the rate of urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery was about 19-38% because of mesorectal excision. The type of drainage is unclear. Some studies show that the rates of urinary tract infection, second catheterization, and urinary symptom are lower with suprapubic catheterization (SPC) than with transurethral catheterization (TUC). Moreover,SPC allows for testing the bladder voiding without drainage removal. Furthermore,SPC using central venous catheter(CVC) is less invasive.
Currently, there is lack of randomized controlled trial(RCT) to compare SPC with TUC. Therefore, investigators perform this prospective randomized trial to compare SPC using CVC with TUC in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Surgery
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F)
Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F) will be performed for patients after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.Suprapubic catheterization is inserted at the end of the procedure. It will be clamped depending on surgeon's specific instruction and removed if the urinary residual is less than 50 cc.
- DEVICE
-
Transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter
Traditional transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter will be performed for patients.The catheterization is removed on day 5 in patients without complication.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fujian Cancer Hospital
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Fujian Provincial Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guoxin Li, M.D., Ph.D. · Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group; Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2018-10-31
- Completion
- 2018-10-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prospective Randomised Study Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00782457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Three-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03426514 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of NOSES and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer
NCT04559087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-Center Randomised Controlled Study to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00788281 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02117557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Endolaparoscopic Versus Immediate Surgery for Obstructing Colorectal Cancers
NCT00164879 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Urinary Retention Following taTME VS laTME Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT06147492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Left Colic Artery Preservation, Anastomotic Reinforcing Sutures and Transanal Tube in Robotic Low Anterior Resection
NCT03609710 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic Assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site
NCT03422835 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robotic-Assisted or Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer With or Without Left Colic Artery Preservation
NCT06376227 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multivisceral Radical Resection for Surgical T4b Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-matched Study Comparing the the Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
NCT05707598 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Application Value of da Vinci Linear Cutting Stapler SureForm in Robotic Anus Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT05667181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
J-Pouch vs Side-to-End Anastomosis After Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT02627729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients Of Colon and Upper Rectal Cancer
NCT05953662 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
End to End Versus Side to End Anastomosis After Anterior Resection of Cancer Rectum
NCT06311279 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Left Hemicolectomy for Left Colon Cancer
NCT03696472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT03209076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PR in Endoscopic LAR for Rectal Cancer
NCT04078828 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03633539 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Versus Partial Preservation of Denonvilliers' Fascia on Urogenital Function in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT04672603 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hemicolectomy Within ERAS in Right-sided Colon Cancer
NCT02944188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT00470951 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3