Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer

NCT02728427 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2018-04-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Compared with traditional open proctectomy, laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, earlier recovery, and better cosmetic outcome, and its long-term oncologic outcomes have been demonstrated. However, the rate of urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery was about 19-38% because of mesorectal excision. The type of drainage is unclear. Some studies show that the rates of urinary tract infection, second catheterization, and urinary symptom are lower with suprapubic catheterization (SPC) than with transurethral catheterization (TUC). Moreover,SPC allows for testing the bladder voiding without drainage removal. Furthermore,SPC using central venous catheter(CVC) is less invasive.

Currently, there is lack of randomized controlled trial(RCT) to compare SPC with TUC. Therefore, investigators perform this prospective randomized trial to compare SPC using CVC with TUC in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F)

Suprapubic catheterization using central venous catheter(CVC-2 7F) will be performed for patients after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.Suprapubic catheterization is inserted at the end of the procedure. It will be clamped depending on surgeon's specific instruction and removed if the urinary residual is less than 50 cc.

DEVICE

Transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter

Traditional transurethral catheterization using Foley catheter will be performed for patients.The catheterization is removed on day 5 in patients without complication.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fujian Cancer Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Fujian Provincial Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Guoxin Li, M.D., Ph.D. · Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group; Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-04-30
Primary Completion
2018-10-31
Completion
2018-10-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02728427 on ClinicalTrials.gov