MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases

NCT06377423 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28

Last updated 2024-04-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the longevity of direct composite compared to indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases using USPHS criteria. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performance of direct composite and indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases over two years.

Conditions

  • Dental Leakage

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Direct technique

The composite was placed directly using free-hand technique

PROCEDURE

Indirect technique

The ceramic was placed using indirect method via laboratory casts

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Abdallah Elshehri, Phd · Dept. of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
35 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-01
Primary Completion
2024-01-01
Completion
2024-01-10

Countries

  • Saudi Arabia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06377423 on ClinicalTrials.gov