Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site
NCT04189718 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2019-12-06
Summary
The present study is a human, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial conducted to explore and compare the clinical and radiological outcome of Osseodensification protocol with conventional implant site preparation protocol. The trial is in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.
Conditions
- Bone Density
- Implant Stability
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
osseodensification protocol
Local anaesthesia was administered and mucoperiosteal flap was reflected. Implant osteotomies was performed with sequential drilling with osseodensification protocol at 1100 rpm. The pilot drill was used in clockwise direction and the other sequential drills were used in counter clockwise direction under copious irrigation. Flap closure was achieved using 3-0 silk sutures to protect the implant site.
- PROCEDURE
-
conventional implant site preparation protocol
Local anaesthesia was administered and mucoperiosteal flap was reflected. Implant osteotomies was performed with sequential drilling with conventional implant site preparation protocol at 1100 rpm. The pilot drill was used in clockwise direction and the other sequential drills were used in clockwise direction under copious irrigation. Flap closure was achieved using 3-0 silk sutures to protect the implant site.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
PRIYANKA ACHARYA, mds · Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences
-
prabhuji mlv, mds · Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2019-10-15
- Completion
- 2019-10-30
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Implant Stability Changes Using Underdrilling Versus Osseodensification Protocols for Posterior Dental Implants
NCT06989684 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Peri-implant Papillary Height Comparison in Microsurgically and Macrosurgically Placed Dental Implants
NCT04189328 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Osseodensification Efficacy on Molar Septum Expansion in Immediate Molar Implant Placement
NCT07108361 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification and Dental Implant Stability
NCT05376020 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla
NCT04442763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods
NCT05390996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Osseodensification on the Peri-implant Condition
NCT06689969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Influence of Vertical Implant Position With Immediate Provisionalization on the Marginal Bone Loss.
NCT05973357 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft & Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated vs Conventional Implants
NCT06541912 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Thread Designs on Primary Stability of Dental Implant Using Osseodensification Technique in Posterior Maxilla : Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07242716 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques
NCT06599112 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Bone Dimension Around Immediate Implants With FDBA and I-PRF vs FDBA Alone
NCT06522321 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Short Implants With Standard-Length Implants - a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT06520332 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification Drills Versus Piezoelectric Surgery
NCT05410405 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Implant Position on Clinical Outcomes
NCT06166316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Density Before and After Placement of Implant Using Osseodensification Technique
NCT06268639 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol
NCT06307691 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation
NCT03357406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
CD vs IOD Opposing Mandibular IOD : Bone Height Changes of the Premaxilla
NCT06752642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different CBCT-derived Templates
NCT02772172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Stability of Posterior Maxillary Implants With Bicortical Fixation
NCT01237184 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Dental Implant Placed Simultaneously With Closed Sinus Lifting Using Hydraulic Lift Technique Versus Summer's Osteotome Technique in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla (RCT)
NCT04659720 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cross-linked Collagen Membrane With and Without Silk Fibroin Around Immediate Dental Implants
NCT06552065 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA