CompariSon Between the EuroPeAn and Japanese pathologiCal InvEstigation for Colon Cancer (SPACE)
NCT06119867 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 430
Last updated 2024-04-09
Summary
In general, the European pathological examination method primarily relies on pathologists and does not require the involvement of surgeons. The Japanese pathological evaluation approach, on the other hand, involves the intervention of surgeons, particularly in the extraction of lymph nodes from fresh specimens and the assessment of specimen quality. Given that the Japanese pathological assessment method lacks systematic evaluation and there is currently no literature clearly demonstrating its diagnostic accuracy, the main objective of this study is to verify whether the diagnostic accuracy of the Japanese pathological investigation method is inferior to that of the European pathological evaluation method.
Conditions
- Colonic Neoplasms
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Japanese pathological investigation
Japanese pathological investigation
- PROCEDURE
-
European pathological investigation
The European pathology evaluation method involves the analysis of fresh and intact specimens. Pathologists carefully inspect the entire specimen's appearance and assess the surgical resection plane and capture complete photographs for documentation purposes before further sectioning the specimen. During specimen processing, the CRM is initially marked with ink or other markers. After fixation, macroscopic data are recorded, and the entire length of the intestine is cut into cross-sections at intervals of 3-4 millimeters. These sections are then undergoing subsequent systematic pathological examination. However, the surgeon will be involved in the Japanese pathological investigation method. Intraoperative markings will be made 10 cm bilaterally from the primary tumor area. The resected colon will be incised at 1 cm intervals, after which the pericolic lymph nodes will be harvested. Each single retrieved lymph node will be packed up independently and will be examined by the pathologist.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Vladimir Balaban · Sechenov University
-
Petr Tsarkov · Sechenov University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-11-14
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-12
- Completion
- 2025-12-01
Countries
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Colorectal Malignancy in Obese Patients
NCT06221878 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Robotic-assisted Left Hemicolectomy for Left Colon Cancer
NCT03696472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performing Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Outside the Primary Registered Medical Institution
NCT04834661 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hemicolectomy Within ERAS in Right-sided Colon Cancer
NCT02944188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and NOSES in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT03470142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of NOSES and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer
NCT04559087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Adenomas
NCT03859479 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Registration Study of Totally Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04853784 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00147134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Intraoperative Adverse Events in Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT05999019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Assisted Colon and Rectal Surgery Prognostic and Outcome Analysis
NCT05210647 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03633539 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03500471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Efficacy Of Complete Mesocolic Excision With Central Vessel Ligation Technique On Lymph Nodes And Safety Margins Compared With Conventional Surgery For Colon Cancer Treatment
NCT04079946 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Transrectal Specimen Extraction for Colon Cancer
NCT06362902 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Underwater Resection for Colorectal Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions
NCT03021135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Autologous Blood Marker Localization in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
NCT05597384 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients With Different Body Mass Index for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer
NCT06396975 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized Controlled Trials on Clinical Outcomes of Totally Laparoscopic Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT03006263 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Obese Patients
NCT04716062 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
NCT03447106 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
NCT06397053 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Colonography Versus Colonoscopy in High Risk Patient
NCT00748449 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA