Reconstruction of the Pelvic Floor and Perineal Wound After Rectal ELAPE
NCT06066931 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2023-10-10
Summary
A multicenter, cohort, randomized, controlled study is being conducted since the 1of September, 2023 whereby the immediate and long-term results of pelvic floor and perineal wound plastic surgery after extralevatory abdominal-perineal extirpation of the rectum will be compared. The study is conducted on the basis of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, the Department of General Surgery at the clinical base of the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution " Krasnodar Regional Hospital No. 1 named after Professor S.V. Ochapovsky" of the Ministry of Health Care of the Krasnodar Territory, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution " Krasnodar Oncological Dispensary No. 1" of the Ministry of Health Care of the Krasnodar Territory The study included patients over 18 years old suffering from cancer of the lower ampullary rectum with T1-T4N0-2M0 (according to the classification of malignant tumors TNM in the 8th edition), who are scheduled for extralevatory abdominal-perineal extirpation of the rectum. Patients are randomized into 3 groups: the first group includes patients with plastic surgery in a simple way (Plastic surgery with local tissues), the second group includes patients with plastic surgery with a mesh endoprosthesis and the third one includes patients with plastic surgery in a new way.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the developed method of pelvic floor and perineal wound plastic surgery after extralevatory abdominal-perineal extirpation of the rectum. It is easily reproducible and provides high-quality closure of the deep and skin defect of the perineal wound. In addition, the new method will reduce the frequency of postoperative complications when compared with the use of conventional methods of closing the defect of the perineum, the method improves the quality of life and provides early rehabilitation of patients.
Study status- patients are being recruited. Number of patients selected is 150 patients. The primary endpoint of the study is the assessment of the early postoperative period and the frequency of postoperative complications (Flap necrosis; Suppuration; Hematoma; Bleeding; Seroma) within 30 days from the date of surgery. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee Protocol No. 112 of 12th November, 2022.
It is planned to recruit patients within 2 years and monitor each of them for 30 days after surgery to assess the primary endpoint and to monitor patients within 1 year to assess the secondary endpoint. The secondary endpoint means an assessment of the frequency of late postoperative complications (perineal fistula, abscess, hernia) and an assessment of the quality of life within 1 year after surgery. It is planned to complete the study in 2025.
Eventually it is planned to publish the protocol of the study, the results obtained after the recruitment of the required number of patients as well as the results of evaluation of the primary endpoint.
Conditions
- Rectum Cancer
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Plastic surgery of the pelvic floor and perineal wound with counter-displaced skin-subcutaneous fascial flaps after extralevatory abdominal-perineal extirpation of the rectum
Skin-subcutaneous fascial flap on the leg is cut out from one side of the perineal wound, and deepithelized, forming a diamond-shaped perineal wound. The cut flap is immersed in the aperture of the pelvis and fixed with single sutures to the remains of levators of the opposite side. The flap width should be 3-4 cm, sufficient to fill the pelvic aperture. On the opposite side of the wound, a skin-subcutaneous fascial flap is cut out on a triangular leg equal to the width of the previously formed diamond-shaped wound. The flap is moved to the center of the wound, additionally filling wound cavity with it, combining the vertex of the triangle with the vertex of the rhombus. The perineal wound is drained through the contraperture. The flap is fixed with separate nodal seams.
- PROCEDURE
-
Plastic surgery of the pelvic floor and perineal wound with local tissues
Simple layer-by-layer suturing of the sciatic-anal and subcutaneous adipose tissue is performed using nodular sutures. The skin was sewn up with nodular sutures at the discretion of surgeons. The installation of abdominal drainage and/or perineal drainage was left to the discretion of the surgeon.
- PROCEDURE
-
Plastic surgery of the pelvic floor and perineal wound with mesh endoprosthesis
A mesh allograft with an adhesive coating is inserted into the bottom of the wound, positioned horizontally between the inner surfaces of the ischial bones and vertically between the sacrum and the vagina in women or between the sacrum and the prostate gland in men. The mesh was sewn from behind on both sides of the coccyx or sacrum. From the side, the mesh was attached to the remainder of the levator muscle and from the front to the transverse muscles of the perineum. The installation of abdominal drainage and/or perineal drainage was left to the discretion of the surgeon. The sciatic-anal and subcutaneous fat are sutured using nodular sutures.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
State Budget Public Health Institution Scientific Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
City Clinical Oncology Hospital No 1
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Kuban State Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Vadim V Polovinkin, MD · Kuban State Medical University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-01
- Completion
- 2026-10-01
More Related Trials
-
Mesh Reinforcement During Temporary Stoma Closure After Sphincter-Saving Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT02576184 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-utility of Two Strategies of Perineal Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection for Anorectal Carcinoma
NCT02841293 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Bowel Dysfunction Program After Low Anterior Resection
NCT04733794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Factors Affecting the Results of Treatment of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
NCT06050447 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer on Anal Physiology + Fecal Incontinence
NCT03283540 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Multicenter Phase II Study of Transanal TME (taTME)
NCT03144765 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum
NCT04936581 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic Assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site
NCT03422835 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Effects of Temporary Ileostomy on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT06391385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Pelvic Peritonization in Laparoscopic or Robotic Low Anterior Resection
NCT03699761 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reinforced Versus Conventional Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Comparative Study
NCT07346534 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Compared to Traditional Total Mesorectal Excision
NCT06505863 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Surviving Rectal Cancer at the Cost of a Colostomy International Validation of the Colostomy Impact Score
NCT03516916 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Evaluation of Short-term Outcomes of Day Surgery for Patients With CuRC
NCT04646915 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Rectal Reconstruction in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT00238381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Exploring the Effect of Colonic J-pouch in Anorectal Preservation Surgery for Ultra-low Rectal Cancer.
NCT06601985 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Regional Anesthesia in Colon Rectal Surgery
NCT00684229 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Organ/Space Surgical Site Infection and Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT06382415 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
J-Pouch Coloanal Anastomosis Compared With Side-to-End Coloanal Anastomosis After Radiation Therapy and Surgery to Remove the Rectum in Treating Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma
NCT00070005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
J-Pouch Colorectal Anastomosis or Straight Colorectal Anastomosis in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer Who Have Undergone Surgery to Remove the Tumor
NCT01110798 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mucosal Flap Reinforced Colorectal Anastomosis and Trans-Anal Vacuum Drainage: A Feasibility Study
NCT04735107 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Timing Evaluation of Stoma Closure (TIMES). Early vs Late Closure of Stoma After Rectal Cancer Surgery.
NCT05284864 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Closure of Protective Ileostomy 2 vs. 12 Weeks After TME
NCT02609451 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA