Gluteal Turnover Flap for Closure of the Perineal Wound After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04004650 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2019-07-02
Summary
Background:
About 700 patients per year undergo an abdominoperineal resection (APR) for distal rectal cancer (Dutch Colorectal Audit 2016).Neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy is often used to further improve locoregional control. Morbidity after APR is substantial and mainly consisting of perineal wound problems in about 35% of the patients. lf primary healing of the perineal wound after APR doesn't occur, secondary healing can take up to one year, and there is even a small proportion of patients in whom a chronic perineal wound or fistula persists after one year. During this long period, intensive wound care is necessary. This results in a heavy burden on both patient and health care resources.
Objective:
The high morbidity rate of the perineal wound has resulted in a continuing discussion on how to close the perineal defect after APR. Our research group recently published the BIOPEX-study (NL42094.018.12), in which 104 patients were randomized between primary perinea! wound closure and biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after APR with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Similar uncomplicated perineal wound healing rate at 30 days (Southampton wound score \< 2) was found: 63% versus 66%, respectively. The hypothesis behind this negative trial result is related to the perineal dead space between the skin and the biological mesh. Fluid will accumulate in this dead space with the risk of secondary contamination and abscess formation, leading to wound dehiscence and purulent discharge. Autologous tissue flaps have been suggested to improve perineal wound healing based on several cohort studies. At least in the Netherlands, these flaps are used only for selected patients with the large defects and highest risk of wound problems, because of the more extensive surgery with added surgical trauma and operative time, and associated donor site morbidity. For these reasons, primary perineal closure (control arm of BIOPEX) is still the standard of care in the Netherlands.
A gluteal turnover flap (GT flap) is a small transposition flap trom the unilateral adjacent perineal skin and subcutaneous fat, which is flipped into the perineal dead space, and stitched with the de-epithelialised dermis to the contralateral pelvic floor remnant. Subsequently, the perineal subcutaneous fat and skin are closed over the flap in the midline, thereby not adding a donor site scar. A small pilot study trom our group showed that this is a promising solution for routine perineal closure after APR.
Study design:
In this multicenter single blinded study, eligible patients will be randomized between pelvic floor reconstruction using a GT flap (intervention arm) and primary closure of the perineal defect (standard arm). The perineal wound healing will be evaluated at 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively using the Southampton wound scoring system by an independent observer.
Conditions
- Wound Heal
- Abdominoperineal Resection
- Rectal Cancer
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Gluteal turnover flap
Link to procedure: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7\_vH2\_1ZZc
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Pieter Tanis, Prof. MD. Phd · Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-06-28
- Primary Completion
- 2022-05-01
- Completion
- 2022-11-01
Countries
- Netherlands
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Adaptive Anastomosis for Anterior Resection in Sigmoid and Proximal Rectal Cancer or Premalignant Lesions
NCT07056374 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection or Open Resection in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00726622 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04481659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Cross" Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection
NCT03731754 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fortune of Temporary Ileostomies in Patients After Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT02532478 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Para Versus Trans Rectus Stoma Placement for Prevention of Stoma Related Complications
NCT06517407 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer on Anal Physiology + Fecal Incontinence
NCT03283540 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum
NCT04936581 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Anterior Perineal Plane for Ultra Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum
NCT00534131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TaTME Versus Open Intersphincteric Resection After Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
NCT01836926 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Resection
NCT04127734 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Collagen Implant (Biological Mesh) Versus GM Flap for Reconstruction of Pelvic Floor After ELAPE in Rectal Cancer
NCT01347697 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Bowel Dysfunction Program After Low Anterior Resection
NCT04733794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of a Post-operative Protocol of Early Mobilization on Functional Recovery and Postoperative Complications After Immediate Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction for Irradiated Abdominoperineal Resection Defects: a Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Clinical Study.
NCT04795609 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
COLOR III Trial: Transanal vs Laparoscopic TME
NCT02736942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Value of Anorectal Manometry Before Ileo- or Sigmoidostomy Closure After Rectal Resection
NCT02196597 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Sphincter Preservation Surgery and Abdominoperineal Resection (APR): Prospective Clinical Trial
NCT01461525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Closure Versus Conventional Closure in Postoperative Patients With Low Anteriresection for Rectal Cancer
NCT03746353 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT00470951 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Quality of Life After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Compared to Traditional Total Mesorectal Excision
NCT06505863 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Is There a Link Between Anatomical Markers of Surgical Difficulty and Incapacity to Reverse Stoma After Low Rectal Cancer Surgery?
NCT04006600 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mesh Reinforcement During Temporary Stoma Closure After Sphincter-Saving Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT02576184 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Closure of Protective Ileostomy in Rectal Cancer Patients
NCT02997267 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Open Technique in Management of Rectal Carcimoma
NCT05685680 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
J-pouch Versus Side-to-end Coloanal Anastomosis After Preoperative Radiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT00956241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA