MedTrace Logo

BioHPP Hybrid Prosthesis Versus BioHPP Bar Implant Supported and Retained Overdenture Rehabilitating Edentulous Mandible

NCT05468983 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 14

Last updated 2022-07-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The biggest challenge of oral rehabilitation is the replacement of lost structures and the restoration of their function and esthetics, focusing on matching a healthy tooth.

Traditional complete dentures, implant (retained, supported) overdentures, and complete implant-supported fixed prostheses are all alternatives to the rehabilitation of the mandibular arch.

The aim of this study was to compare BioHPP used as a skeletal substructure for hybrid (implant fixed, detachable) prostheses versus BioHPP bar supporting and retaining by using radiographic tracing to the marginal bone height changes around the implants, patient satisfaction can be improved.

Conditions

  • Marginal Bone Loss
  • Patient Satisfaction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

surgical ( implants placement)

4 implants were placed interforamen of the mandibular arch by using the surgical guide

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mahmoud H El Afandy, prof · faculty of dentistry ,Ain Shames University

  • Magda H Mohamed, lectu · faculty of dentistry ,Ain Shames University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
55 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-05-21
Primary Completion
2021-12-20
Completion
2022-02-20

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05468983 on ClinicalTrials.gov