Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Linear Incision for Connective Tissue
NCT06365983 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2024-04-15
Summary
A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial will be conducted with 24 individuals aged 18 or older, who are periodontally healthy and require root coverage in bilateral multiple RT1-type recessions involving at least two teeth on each side of the mouth. The number of teeth to be covered must be equal on both sides to avoid imbalance in patient-centered comparisons.
Patients included in the study will undergo the bilateral multiple root coverage technique with coronally repositioned flap (Zucchelli and De Sanctis) in both groups. The donor areas for connective tissue will be the hard palate region, with grafts harvested using the linear technique on one side and the free de-epithelialized gingival graft technique on the other side.
Each patient will undergo a preparatory phase for study inclusion, consisting of supragingival scaling, polishing, and oral hygiene instructions at least 3 weeks before study inclusion. Patients will be instructed on personalized and proper use of toothbrush, dental floss, and/or interdental brush.
All surgical procedures in both groups will be performed by the same operator (CCO). Randomization will determine the side to be operated on first. The other side will be operated on after 30 days or until the patient reports complete absence of symptoms in the area of the first surgery to avoid confusion in patient-centered outcomes regarding pain and satisfaction with the techniques.
Outcomes evaluated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months include: gingival recession depth, probing depth, visible plaque, bleeding on probing, width of keratinized tissue, three-dimensional tissue assessment from intraoral scanning, and quality of life related. Linear and logistic generalized estimating equation models considering the longitudinal nature of the study will be used for data analysis.
INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients aged 18 or older requiring root coverage in bilateral multiple recessions involving at least two teeth on each side of the mouth will be included. The number of teeth to be covered must be equal on both sides to avoid imbalance in patient-centered comparisons. Recessions should be RT1 type according to the 2017 Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal Conditions and Diseases (Jepsen et al. 2018) and without non-carious cervical lesions.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Individuals will not be considered eligible if they:
* Present any form of immunological compromise;
* Have diseases or systemic conditions contraindicating surgical procedures or affecting periodontal healing pattern, such as diabetes and autoimmune diseases;
* Present active periodontitis, defined by presence of \>=10% subgingival bleeding and probing depth and clinical attachment loss proximal \>4mm (Tonetti et al. 2018);
* Are current or ex-smokers;
* Have allergies to ibuprofen and chlorhexidine digluconate.
Research Objective:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE The overall objective of this study is to compare free gingival graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft in outcomes related to multiple recession coverage.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE
Compare the two grafts in terms of clinical outcomes of root coverage; Compare the two grafts in terms of digital outcomes of root coverage obtained in scanning and tomography; Compare the two grafts in terms of patient-centered outcomes.
Conditions
- Connective Tissue
- Gingiva
- Gingival Recession
- Humans
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Connective Tissue with Free Gingival Graft
The de-epithelialized free gingival grafting will begin with two horizontal incisions, 1.0 to 1.5 mm apical to the margin of the soft tissue of the adjacent teeth and two vertical incisions to delimit the area to be grafted. Along the coronal horizontal incision, the blade will be oriented almost perpendicular to the bone surface, and once an adequate thickness of soft tissue is obtained, it will be rotated to become almost parallel to the external surface of the palate. The graft thickness will be maintained uniform and the wound will be protected with absorbable collagen sponge derived from swine (Spongostan; Ethicon, Somerville, USA) and maintained with compressive sutures with non-absorbable 5-0 monofilament thread (Microsuture, São Paulo), anchored to the soft tissue apical to the area of the palatal wound. Immediately after suture completion, drops of high viscosity cyanoacrylate adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV; Glustitch, Delta, Canada) will be applied.
- PROCEDURE
-
Connective Tissue with Linear Incision
The linear technique (Lorenzana ER, Allen EP 2000) will begin with a horizontal incision 2 mm apical to the gingival margin, perpendicular to the palate, which is deepened to the bone crest. Next, a second incision is made to divide the flap and expose the connective tissue bed. The thickness of the outer portion of the flap should be at least 1 mm, with uniformity throughout its extension to reduce the risk of epithelial tissue necrosis. Subsequently, internal lateral incisions (mesial and distal) and the base incision will be made, connecting the vertical incisions to delineate horizontal and vertical boundaries. Immediately after graft removal, an absorbable hemostatic collagen sponge derived from swine (Spongostan; Ethicon, Somerville, USA) will be placed and sutured using non-absorbable 5-0 monofilament thread (Microsuture, São Paulo).Immediately after suturing is completed, drops of high viscosity cyanoacrylate adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV; Glustitch, Delta, Canada) will be applied.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-04-28
- Primary Completion
- 2025-04-28
- Completion
- 2026-04-28
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Volume Stable Collagen Matrix in RT2 Gingival Recession Compared to Connective Tissue Graft
NCT05568732 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of a Modified Technique of Free Gingival Graft in Volumetric Changes of the Graft: Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02613702 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Recession (RT1) Treatment With Different Gingival Augmentation Surgeries
NCT05688293 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Tuberosity Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06650072 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Connective Tissue Graft Around Implants
NCT03106506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of Vestibular Depth on Predictability of Miller Class III/ RT2 Gingival Recession Coverage
NCT06000228 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two Techniques for Root Coverage With a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix
NCT02129504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Connective Tissue Graft Versus Collagen Matrix.
NCT04678804 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession With Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT06646432 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Free Mucogingival Graft for Isolated Root Coverage
NCT05851248 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Root Coverage Stability.
NCT05439382 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparative Evaluation of CTG With and Without rhPDGF- BB Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Root Coverage
NCT03676088 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
NCT05923294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype.
NCT06432439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
NCT05045586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
NCT06044870 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Buccal Ginvigal Recessions With the Tunnel Technique in Conjunction With Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft. A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05436002 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft
NCT06366022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
NCT07064603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Root Coverage for Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial Using Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique and Novomatrix®
NCT06719648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions on Root Coverage
NCT06438094 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect Of Microneedling With Coronally Advanced Flap For Management of RT1 Gingival Recession In Thin Gingival Phenotype
NCT06988839 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Histomorphometric Analysis of Collagen Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Mucogingival Surgery in Orthodontic Patients
NCT03533933 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Histological Assessment of Free Gingival Graft or Collagen Matrix for Socket Sealing After Bone Grafting
NCT05448040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA