MedTrace Logo

Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After UKA

NCT05204797 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2026-01-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the percentage of early micromibilisation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in robot-assisted technique vs standard technique.

Conditions

  • Loosening, Prosthesis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Robot-assisted UKA

Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and robotic assistance. Tourniquet will be used in all patients.

PROCEDURE

Standard technique UKA

Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and standard technique. Tourniquet will be used in all patients.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Smith & Nephew, Inc.

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof. · IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

  • Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Prof. · IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

  • Stefano Fratini, Dr. · IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

  • Stefano Di Paolo, Eng. · University of Bologna

  • Laura Bragonzoni, Dr. · University of Bologna

  • Raffaele Zinno, Dr. · University of Bologna

  • Giuseppe Barone, Dr. · University of Bologna

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-10-07
Primary Completion
2027-12-31
Completion
2027-12-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05204797 on ClinicalTrials.gov