RSA Restoris MultiCompartmental Knee
NCT05417984 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 33
Last updated 2022-06-14
Summary
Patients with isolated medial compartment arthritis of the knee are commonly treated with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). In contrast with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), UKA shows a higher revision rate, which might be due to implant malpositioning and postoperative malalignment of the lower limb and incorrect soft tissue balancing. Nowadays, robotic-assisted UKA is used which improves accurate positioning, optimizes soft-tissue balancing and optimizes radiographic alignment of the implant. The potential benefit could be that this better alignment and positioning results in improved functional outcome and long-term survivorship. As there is a lack in long-term results, more research is needed to the long-term results of robotic-assisted UKA. As long-term results are related to early migration of the implant, investigating the early migration will have additional value to predict the long-term results of robotic-assisted UKA. In this study, we will investigate the early migration of a unicompartmental knee implant (Restoris MultiCompartmental Knee Implant System (Restoris MCK)) used in robotic-assisted UKA using model-based roentgen stereogrammetric analysis (mRSA) and we will relate the migration of this implant to the long-term results of the implant.
The primary objective is to assess the fixation and migration patterns of the Restoris MutliCompartmental Knee Implant System (Stryker) in vivo, using mRSA, over 5 years. Secondary objectives are to analyse survival, clinical scores and radiographic aspects of the Restoris MultiCompartmental Knee Implant System (Stryker) and to relate these to the migration patterns over 5 years.
A prospective cohort study with 5 years follow-up, in which 33 patients will be enrolled. Patients 18 years or older who require a unicompartmental knee prosthesis as a result of moderately disabling joint disease of the knee will be included. During surgery tantalum markers will be placed to be able to perform mRSA. Patients will be evaluated preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years.
The main study parameters are the migration of the Restoris MCK of both the tibial and femoral component presented in x-, y- and z-direction. Secondary study parameters are the alignment, survival of the Restoris MCK, clinical scores and radiographic aspects (both x-ray and CT scan).
Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Restoris MCK
During this study the Restoris MCK will be placed using robotic-assisted surgery. At the time of surgery tantalum markers will be placed in the tibia and femur. With these markers migration of the prothesis can be measured over time using RSA radiographs.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Reinier Haga Orthopedisch Centrum
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2029-06-30
- Completion
- 2029-06-30
- FDA Device
- Yes
More Related Trials
-
Joint Line Reconstruction in Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision
NCT01601756 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Contemporary Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02861794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty(TKA)
NCT03659318 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Unicondylar- or Total Knee Replacement? Patient Satisfaction, Function and Muscle Mass
NCT02563756 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty, the Correlation to CT Scans and Clinical Results
NCT02071745 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Survivorship and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Medial Partial Knee Replacement
NCT01845597 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06821269 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparative Outcomes Between Imageless Robotic-assisted and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04307251 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty vs. Conventional One
NCT04611815 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Radiological, Clinical, Functional Outcomes Between Anatomically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04183985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Navigation-assisted OrthoPilot® Elite and Robotic-assisted MAKO® Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05980442 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Randomised Control Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes for Navigated Kinematically Aligned TKR Versus Navigated Mechanically Aligned TKR
NCT04246138 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficacy Between Restricted Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment in Bilateral TKA
NCT06323577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Anatomically Aligned and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients
NCT04181216 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Comparing Robotically-Assisted vs. Manually-Executed Total Knee Arthroplasties
NCT03482349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ROM Outcomes in Patients Undergoing a Primary TKA
NCT04217486 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effect of Mechanical and Functional Alignment in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty on Ankle Alignment
NCT06259032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Residual Pain After Successful Implant of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04995679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Standard and Robot Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Bicrucatie Retaining Prosthesis
NCT04334304 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) of Medial Osteoarthritis
NCT03457051 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Implant Positioning With Robotic Aided Surgery and Traditional Jig Positioning in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03052790 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Novel Robotic TKA System
NCT06638047 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Finnish Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty Investigation
NCT02481427 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Functionally Aligned vs Mechanical Axis Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04748510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment and Adjusted Mechanical Alignment With Robotic-assisted Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
NCT06835621 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA