Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty(TKA)
NCT03659318 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 674
Last updated 2019-07-23
Summary
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to attempt to enhance the precision of bone preparation, component alignment and ultimately improve clinical results and survivorship of TKA. Although several published data suggest that bone preparation, and knee component alignment were improved by using robotic assistance, there is no high-quality evidence from randomized trials at long-term of which investigators are aware evaluating whether the improved bone preparation and knee component alignment improved clinical function or longevity of the TKA.
Conditions
- Arthritis
- Knee Arthropathy
- Robotics
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Robotic-assisted TKA
Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with help of robotic surgery system, using a Robodoc system. CT-based preoperative planning using ORTHODOC (Integrated Surgical Technology Corp) performed in the first step before the day of surgery, and the robotic-assisted surgery using the ROBODOC surgical assistance in the second step. The bone markers are registered to the computer, and the computer arm does all the cutting and preparation of bones. This is in contrast to conventional jigs and cutting blocks. Actual implantation of the implants is done by a surgeon. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional TKA
Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with classical, conventional, manual method. A surgeon measures the angle, length of the cuts with bone landmarks and specialized surgical instruments. After all the cuts actual implantation is done. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ewha Womans University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2002-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2008-02-29
- Completion
- 2018-07-31
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement
NCT05391152 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Cruciate-Retaining Versus Bi-Cruciate Stabilized
NCT06838663 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Do We Need Computer Assistance To Improve the Survival of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Minimum Ten Years Follow-up
NCT01520571 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment and Adjusted Mechanical Alignment With Robotic-assisted Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
NCT06835621 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Radiological, Clinical, Functional Outcomes Between Anatomically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04183985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Comparing Robotically-Assisted vs. Manually-Executed Total Knee Arthroplasties
NCT03482349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functionally Aligned vs Mechanical Axis Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04748510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment With Gait Analysis of Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Inverse Kinematic Alignment
NCT04912973 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After UKA
NCT05204797 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Outcomes Between Imageless Robotic-assisted and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04307251 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07212296 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Navigation-assisted OrthoPilot® Elite and Robotic-assisted MAKO® Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05980442 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Anatomically Aligned and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients
NCT04181216 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Image Based Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Imageless Augmented Reality Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06891807 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty Robot Assisted With MAKO™ Robotic System Compared to the Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty by Mechanical Ancillary
NCT03566875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-Term Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasties (TKAs) in Patients With OA ≤50 Years Old
NCT01361152 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Hierarchical Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05404568 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Robotic-assisted (MAKO) Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT07201207 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Early Clinical Benefits of Robot-Assisted vs Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty (RATKA-EARLY)
NCT07078149 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Implant Positioning With Robotic Aided Surgery and Traditional Jig Positioning in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03052790 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Accuracy and Functional Outcome Between Robotic and Gyroscopic Assisted Surgery in Primary TKA
NCT06321952 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CAS vs Standard Technique in TKA: Comparison of Clinical and Functional Results
NCT06608745 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Robot Assisted Total Knee Replacement Outcomes
NCT03523897 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ambulatory and Functional Improvement by Morning Walk
NCT03183856 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Highly Cross-Linked and Conventional Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02020057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA