MedTrace Logo

Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Approaches in Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

NCT00839020 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26

Last updated 2016-07-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

50 patients are randomized to two groups who receive a navigated knee prosthesis. Aim of the study is a comparison between a minimally invasive and a conventional approach. In both groups OrthoPilot computer assisted-navigation will be used. Pain intensity as well as concomitant pain medication are monitored during the first 20 postoperative days and will be compared for the two groups. Various scores are surveyed.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Navigated TKA with a minimally invasive approach

Navigated total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive approach

PROCEDURE

Navigated TKA with a conventional approach

A navigated total knee arthroplasty is performed using the Orthopilot navigation system. A conventional approach is performed

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aesculap AG

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Frank Lampe, MD · Schön Kliniken Klinikum Eilbek

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-11-30
Primary Completion
2012-07-31
Completion
2013-01-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00839020 on ClinicalTrials.gov