MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement

NCT05391152 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2022-05-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, and case-control study. Five joint centers and 100 participants will be included. The study group used robotic-assisted modified kinematic alignment total knee replacement, and the control study used traditional alignment manual total knee replacement. The knee society score (KSS), Hip-knee-ankle(HKA) angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle(mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle(mMPTA), sagittal femoral component angle(SFCA), range of motion(ROM), WOMAC score, SF-36, Visual Analogue Scale(VAS score), surgical time, blood loss, and complications are evaluated and compared.

Conditions

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

DEVICE

robotic assisted total knee replacement

the study group used robotic-arm assisted total knee replacement.

DEVICE

traditional total knee replacement

the control group used traditional total knee replacement

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-09-01
Primary Completion
2025-05-01
Completion
2025-10-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05391152 on ClinicalTrials.gov