Longitudinal Study of Different Surgical Approaches in Chinese Patients of Uterine Cervical Cancer

NCT03738969 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 3000

Last updated 2018-11-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This multi-center longitudinal study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (vaginal, laparotomy and laparoscopy), which is the primary study objective. All clinical and pathological data would be retracted from case reviews, and all survival data would be reached by clinic, telephone and mail follow-up. This study also would analyze the impact on survival outcomes of other factors, including nerve-sparing techniques, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and infection of human papillomavirus. The predictive effects of different following protocol and imaging plans will be also compared. Last, the influences of surgical routes on the fertility outcomes (pregnancy and its complications) and the ovarian reserve are important secondary study objectives.

Conditions

  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Laparotomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Survival
  • Mortality
  • Recurrence

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparotomic radical hysterectomy

Radical hysterectomy applied by laparotomy

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy

Radical hysterectomy applied by laparoscopic

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Lei Li

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-11-10
Primary Completion
2022-12-23
Completion
2023-12-23

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03738969 on ClinicalTrials.gov