Rate, Rhythm or Risk Control for New-onset Supraventricular Arrhythmia During Septic Shock: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04844801 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 240
Last updated 2026-01-07
Summary
New-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (NOSVA) is reported in 40 % of patients with septic shock and is associated with hemodynamic alterations and mortality. The lack of consensus regarding best practices for the management of NOSVA in this setting has led to major variations in practice patterns. Observational studies reported three usual strategies: (i) heart rate control (hereafter rate control) with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on low dose of amiodarone, (ii) rhythm control with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on high dose of amiodarone, and electrical cardioversionand (iii) modifiable NOSVA risk factors control (hereafter risk control) without using antiarrhythmic drugs.
Risk control would minimize adverse events of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rhythm control would rapidly improve haemodynamics via restoring diastole and decreasing cardiac metabolic demand, while minimizing exposure to anticoagulation. Heart-Rate control, would limit potential adverse events of high dose of amiodarone and of electrical cardioversion (only in patients intubated on mechanical ventilation), while controlling haemodynamics. Therefore, it seems important to compare these three strategies.
Our hypothesis is dual: first, that heart-rate control and rhythm control each improve hemodynamics with in fine a decreased mortality, as compared to a risk control; second, that rhythm control outperforms rate control in this setting.
This is a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of these three strategies (risk control, rate control and rhythm control) for NOSVA during septic shock.
Conditions
- Supraventricular Arrhythmia
- Septic Shock
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Risk control strategy
* Magnesium sulfate 2g intravenous bolus over 20 mn (if creatinine clearance \>30 mL/min) * Control of the modifiable NOSVA risk factors: hypovolemia, sepsis, metabolic disorders (e.g., hypokalemia, hyponatremia), acidosis, hypoxia, excess cardiac inotropism of vasopressors, central venous catheter malposition, hyperthermia.
- PROCEDURE
-
Heart-Rate control strategy:
* Risk-control as described above * "Low dose" amiodarone: * Intravenous loading bolus (day-1): bolus of 4 mg/kg IV over 1hour (maximum 300 mg IV over 1 hour ) * Enteral maintenance dose (oral or via gastric tube) (day-1 to day-7) 200mg/24hour in a single dose for 7 days (150 mg intravenous over 1hour if enteral route is unavailable)
- PROCEDURE
-
Rhythm control strategy:
* Risk control as described above * "High dose" amiodarone: * Intravenous loading dose (day-1): initial bolus 7 mg/kg over 1 hour (maximum 600 mg i.e. 4 IVL vials over 1 hour); followed by continuous intravenous maintenance: for a total of 1200 mg over the first 24 hours (infusion pump) * Enteral dose maintenance Day-2 and day-3: 1200 mg/ 24 hours in three doses for 48hours (720 mg continuous intravenous over 24 hours if enteral route is unavailable). Day-4 to day-7: 200 mg/24 hours once a day (150 mg intravenous over 1hourr if enteral route is unavailable) - Electrical cardioversion (only in patients intubated on mechanical ventilation) 1 to 3 external electric shocks starting at 200J if: * NOSVA persists after initial bolus of amiodarone AND norepinephrine base (or epinephrine base) doses \> 0.3 µg/kg/min; * NOSVA persists more than 6 hours after initial IV loading dose of amiodarone. NB: Beyond day 7 (or after discharge from intensive care if this occurs before da
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Vincent LABBE, MD · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-11-09
- Primary Completion
- 2026-02-28
- Completion
- 2026-03-31
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effects of Norepinephrine and Volume Expansion in Capillary Refill Time in Septic Shock
NCT04870892 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Place of Echocardiography in IV Fluid Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
NCT02899897 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Landiolol Versus Standard of Care for Prevention of Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for a Septic Shock With Hypercontractility
NCT04748796 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Prognostic Impact of Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction on the Survival of Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT06193109 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pilot Study: Echocardiographic and Hemodynamic Effects of Esmolol in Septic Shock Patients
NCT02842983 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Fluid Intolerance Signals as Safety Limits to Prevent Fluid-induced Harm During Septic Shock Resuscitation
NCT06568744 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Vasopressin on Kidney and Cardiac Function in Septic Shock
NCT06125184 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Early Use of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock Resuscitation
NCT01945983 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evolution of Tissue Perfusion and Venous Congestion Markers in Fluid-Responsive Septic Shock Patients
NCT06958809 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Effects of Heart Control at Different Stages in Patients of Septic Shock With Tachycardia
NCT05389176 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Strain Echocardiography During Septic Shock : an Observational Pilot Study
NCT03663192 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluating the Effect of Chronic Antihypertensive Therapy on Vasopressor Dosing in Septic Shock
NCT02884011 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Heart Rate Control With Esmolol in Septic Shock
NCT01231698 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Protocolized Reduction of Non-resuscitation Fluids vs Usual Care in Septic Shock Feasibility Trial
NCT05249088 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Randomized Controlled Trial of Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound-guided Fluid Management in Septic Shock Resuscitation
NCT03020407 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cardiac Stress in Septic Shock - Biomarkers, Echocardiography and Outcome
NCT01747187 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Sepsis Early EvaluatioN Through Rapid Ultrasound and veNous Gas Analysis
NCT05787184 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effect of Heart Rate Control With Ivabradine on Hemodynamic in Patients With Sepsis
NCT05882708 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effects of Fluid Therapy on Peripheral TIssse Perfusion During Sepsis/Septic Shock
NCT05094856 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultrasound Optimization of Initial Fluid Challenge in Sepsis
NCT04028102 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Prognostic Role of Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock
NCT06008067 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
SHOCK US STUDY: Fluid Responsiveness in Sepsis Measured by Ultrasonography
NCT02170233 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Preemptive Resuscitation for Eradication of Septic Shock
NCT01449721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fever Control Using External Cooling in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock
NCT04494074 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Discontinuation Order of Vasopressors in Septic Shock
NCT01493102 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA