Comparison of Landiolol Versus Standard of Care for Prevention of Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for a Septic Shock With Hypercontractility

NCT04748796 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 360

Last updated 2025-08-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Several data emphasize the relation between tachycardia (\>90/min) and high mortality during septic shock. The investigators previously demonstrated the high mortality associated with hypercontractility, tachycardia and the presence of a left ventricular obstruction. A severe hypovolemia, a hyper adrenergic stimulation or a severe vasoplegia can all explain this relation between tachycardia, hypercontractility and the mortality during septic shock.

Landiolol is another short-term acting beta-blocker with a half-life of 4 minutes without any beta 2 activity or membrane stabilizing effect. The landiolol has been used in critically ill patients to control supraventricular tachycardia but not in this context of tachycardia and septic shock. The investigators hypothesize that landiolol by reducing the heart rate may improve the survival of patients treated for a septic shock and presenting with an hypercontractility state.

Conditions

  • Septic Shock
  • Tachycardia
  • Mortality During Septic Shock
  • Beta-blocker

Interventions

OTHER

echocardiography

Full echocardiography will be performed at baseline and during the follow-up at H1, H3, H6 and H12.

DRUG

Landiolol

Patients randomized to the experimental group will be treated according to the standard of care plus for 2 days with landiolol IV started at a dose of 1 microgram/kg/min and progressively increased every 10 minutes to a maximum of 40 micrograms/kg/min.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • CH Dieppe

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • CH Elbeuf

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • CH Le Havre

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais

    collaborator OTHER
  • CH Compiègne

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • CH Laon

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University Hospital, Caen

    collaborator OTHER
  • CH Cherbourg

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University Hospital, Lille

    collaborator OTHER
  • CH Douai

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • CH Montreuil

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix

    collaborator OTHER
  • Centre Hospitalier de Bethune

    collaborator NETWORK
  • CH Lomme

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Centre Hospitalier de Lens

    collaborator OTHER
  • Tourcoing Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Centre Hospitalier VALENCIENNES

    collaborator OTHER
  • Centre Hospitalier Arras

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Brest

    collaborator OTHER
  • Henri Mondor University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hospital Avicenne

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Montpellier

    collaborator OTHER
  • CH Calais

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Hôpital Edouard Herriot

    collaborator OTHER
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

    collaborator OTHER
  • Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-02-01
Primary Completion
2027-06-30
Completion
2027-09-30

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04748796 on ClinicalTrials.gov