Evaluation of Different Anchorage-supported Appliances and Expansion Procedures for Face Mask Treatment
NCT06244563 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2024-02-06
Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of two appliances (Hybrid-Hyrax expander/ Bonded rapid maxillary expander (RME)) supported by different anchorage units and two different expansion procedures (routine rapid maxillary expansion protocol (routine)/ alternative rapid expansion and constriction protocol (alt-RAMEC)) on maxillary protraction during face mask (FM) treatment.
Conditions
- Malocclusion, Angle Class III
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Face mask with Hybrid-Hyrax
Participants were treated with face mask using a Hybrid-Hyrax appliance as an anchor in the maxillary arch. The anchorage of hybrid-hyrax appliance was provided by bands adapted to the maxillary first permanent molars and two mini screws in the anterior palate. Force transmission was achieved using intermaxillary elastics that were connected to the face mask arms from the hooks of the hybrid-hyrax appliance in the maxillary canine region.
- DEVICE
-
Face mask with Bonded RME
Participants were treated with face mask using a bonded RME appliance as an anchor in the maxillary arch. The anchorage of bonded RME appliance was provided by maxillary posterior teeth covered with acrylic cap. Force transmission was achieved using intermaxillary elastics that were connected to the face mask arms from the hooks of the bonded RME in the maxillary canine region.
- PROCEDURE
-
Alternative Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Contraction Protocol (Alt-RAMEC)
In the groups that started with the Alt-Ramec protocol, the parents expanded the appliance screw twice a day in the first week and closed it in the opposite direction in the following week. This process was continued for 7-9 weeks according to the patient's need for expansion.
- PROCEDURE
-
Routine Rapid Maxillary Expansion Protocol
In the groups that started with the routine protocol, parents activated the expansion screw twice a day for 1-2 weeks, depending on the patient's need for expansion.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Gaziantep
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Aysegul Gulec, PhD · University of Gaziantep
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 8 Years
- Max Age
- 12 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-08
- Primary Completion
- 2023-04-10
- Completion
- 2023-06-09
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Class III Malocclusion and ALT-RAMEC
NCT05913076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Open Bite Activator and Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics on the Masseter Muscle
NCT06949527 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Orthopedic Face Mask Use on Head Posture and Pharyngeal Airway
NCT05114642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT04604392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoral Maxillary Protraction Technique vs Facemask Using Alt-RAMEC Protocol for Treatment Class III Growing Patients
NCT05345756 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Open Bite With Open Bite Activator and Skeletal Anchorage-Supported Vertical Elastics
NCT06936371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth-Borne Versus Tooth-Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders: A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation of Soft Tissues
NCT04828213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Electromyography Study Comparing the Impact of Using RMEs on Muscle Activity Among Growing Orthodontic Patients
NCT02752347 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polygraphic Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Sleep Quality
NCT04529213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Bone-anchored Protraction on Maxillary Growth in the Young Child
NCT02711111 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treating Growing Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Maxillary Constriction
NCT06762418 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
NCT04354116 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Customized and Standard Facemasks for Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT06402656 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Evaluation of Maxillary Expansion Methods
NCT07262892 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Protocol of Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)
NCT05489302 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Maxillary Expansion Methods on Nasomaxillary Structures
NCT07326345 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Rapid and Slow Maxillary Expansion
NCT04734054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Response After Maxillary Orthopedic Expansion in Class II Growing Subjects
NCT03159962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Maxillary Expansion
NCT05248087 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Various Rapid Palatal Expansion Appliances on Dentoskeletal, Dentoalveolar, Nasal and Airway Resistance
NCT06009796 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Acrylic and Clear Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Crossbite in Children
NCT06792513 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT03976635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Tooth-borne Expanders in Rapid Maxillary Expansion
NCT03846518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Appliance Effects on Mandibular Soft Tissues
NCT06935032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Mini-implant Assisted Maxillary Expansion in Adolescents and Adults
NCT06449014 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA