Evaluation of Different Anchorage-supported Appliances and Expansion Procedures for Face Mask Treatment

NCT06244563 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-02-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of two appliances (Hybrid-Hyrax expander/ Bonded rapid maxillary expander (RME)) supported by different anchorage units and two different expansion procedures (routine rapid maxillary expansion protocol (routine)/ alternative rapid expansion and constriction protocol (alt-RAMEC)) on maxillary protraction during face mask (FM) treatment.

Conditions

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III

Interventions

DEVICE

Face mask with Hybrid-Hyrax

Participants were treated with face mask using a Hybrid-Hyrax appliance as an anchor in the maxillary arch. The anchorage of hybrid-hyrax appliance was provided by bands adapted to the maxillary first permanent molars and two mini screws in the anterior palate. Force transmission was achieved using intermaxillary elastics that were connected to the face mask arms from the hooks of the hybrid-hyrax appliance in the maxillary canine region.

DEVICE

Face mask with Bonded RME

Participants were treated with face mask using a bonded RME appliance as an anchor in the maxillary arch. The anchorage of bonded RME appliance was provided by maxillary posterior teeth covered with acrylic cap. Force transmission was achieved using intermaxillary elastics that were connected to the face mask arms from the hooks of the bonded RME in the maxillary canine region.

PROCEDURE

Alternative Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Contraction Protocol (Alt-RAMEC)

In the groups that started with the Alt-Ramec protocol, the parents expanded the appliance screw twice a day in the first week and closed it in the opposite direction in the following week. This process was continued for 7-9 weeks according to the patient's need for expansion.

PROCEDURE

Routine Rapid Maxillary Expansion Protocol

In the groups that started with the routine protocol, parents activated the expansion screw twice a day for 1-2 weeks, depending on the patient's need for expansion.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Gaziantep

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Aysegul Gulec, PhD · University of Gaziantep

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
8 Years
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-06-08
Primary Completion
2023-04-10
Completion
2023-06-09

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06244563 on ClinicalTrials.gov