Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement, Comparison of Active Fixation Bipolar and Passive Quadripolar Pacemaker Leads

NCT04632472 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 62

Last updated 2020-11-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A prospective, randomized and patient-blinded trial comparing an active fixation left ventricular lead with quadripolar passive left ventricular leads. The leads were compared in order to identify differences in the electrical performance, the ability to achieve a stable proximal position in a coronary vein located concordant to target segment and clinical outcome. The patients were followed up for 12 months.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Active fixation bipolar lead versus passive fixation quadripolar leads in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy trial comparing types of leads.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Haukeland University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-02-15
Primary Completion
2018-10-31
Completion
2018-10-31

Countries

  • Norway

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04632472 on ClinicalTrials.gov