Pinhole Surgical Technique Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT04356391 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 43
Last updated 2023-05-25
Summary
This study compares the efficacy of root coverage achieved by the Pinhole Surgical Technique (PST) technique and the Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) technique in the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recession defects. All patients will receive PST in one quadrant and CTG in another quadrant.
The hypothesis being tested is: Pinhole Surgical Technique outcomes are not inferior to those of the Connective Tissue Graft surgical technique.
Conditions
- Periodontal Diseases
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Connective Tissue Graft Technique
For the sites receiving the control technique (Connective Tissue Graft), the technique described by Langer B. and Langer L. will be started with a sulcular incision followed by a partial thickness flap. A CTG is then harvested according to the technique described by Bruno, the first incision is perpendicular to the 2nd premolar and 1st molar and is 2-3mm apical to their gingival margin as wide as the recipient site, followed by a second incision parallel to the for mentioned teeth, 1-2mm apical to the first incision, then the CTG is raised by periosteal elevator and released from apical and lateral attachments by sharp incision when needed. The graft is then prepared to have a homogenous thickness of 1.5-2mm. The donor CTG is stabilized to the underlying connective tissue interproximally using 4-0 Vicryl sutures. The recipient flap is repositioned coronally, to cover as much as possible of the graft with no tension, 2mm coronal to the CEJ, then sutured with 4-0 Vicryl sutures.
- PROCEDURE
-
Pinhole Surgical Technique
For the sites receiving the test technique (Chao Pinhole Surgical Technique) the surgery starts with a small pinhole opening in the alveolar mucosa apical to the mucogingival junction of the affected tooth, the flap is then undermined using special instruments to create a full thickness pouch, followed by extending the pouch horizontally and coronally to undermined the adjacent papilla without incising it and free the flap for its coronal displacement. Then multiple 2x12mm strips of collagen resorbable membrane material (Bio-Gide, Geistlich Pharma AG) are packed under the papilla to secure the flap in a coronal direction. Gentle pressure is applied for 5 minutes to minimize the thickness of the blood clot after each of the procedures. The patients are advised to brush all teeth and sites except the buccal surfaces of the operated-on teeth, which are to be cleaned with 0.12% Chlorhexidine mouth rinse.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Geistlich Pharma AG
collaborator INDUSTRY -
State University of New York at Buffalo
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Othman Shibly, DDS · University at Buffalo
-
Yahya Sayed Suliman Atassi, BDS · University at Buffalo
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-24
- Primary Completion
- 2022-08-02
- Completion
- 2023-04-26
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft
NCT06366022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Esthetic Root Coverage Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access in Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03588052 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tunnel Technique With Emdogain® in Addition to Connective Tissue Graft Compared With Connective Tissue Graft Alone for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT03354104 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Subpithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Tunneling Technique in Treating RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT04104087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
NCT05045586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Surgical Technique for Root Coverage Using PRF
NCT04202198 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Treatment of Gingival Recessions with Connective Tissue or Concentrated Growth Factor Membrane Using Tunnel Technique
NCT04561947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Periosteal Pedicle Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Gingival Recession
NCT06529640 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Surgical Technique With And Without Use Of Buttons For Treatment Of Multiple Gingival Recessions: RCT
NCT02632968 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of Vestibular Depth on Predictability of Miller Class III/ RT2 Gingival Recession Coverage
NCT06000228 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Methods of Covering a Single Lower Front Tooth With Receded Gums
NCT06037161 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Geistlich Fibro-Gide® + CAF in Comparison to CTG + CAF for the Treatment of Recession Defects at 6 Months
NCT04260152 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Volume Stable Collagen Matrix in RT2 Gingival Recession Compared to Connective Tissue Graft
NCT05568732 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Tunnel Approach in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT02642887 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Adhesion Molecule Loaded Hydrogel With Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defect
NCT05653245 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Effectiveness of the Papillary Extended Connective Tissue Graft in Miller Class III Gingival Recession
NCT03416673 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MINST Versus Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation In RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT06044727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Changes of Soft Tissue Grafting: A Randomized Study
NCT05633511 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Root Coverage Stability.
NCT05439382 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Chorion Membrane With Photobiostimulation ,Chorion Membrane & SCTG in Treating Isolated RT 2 Recession Defects
NCT06433973 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Connective Graft and Xenogeneic Matrix, in Patients With Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03207984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Recession (RT1) Treatment With Different Gingival Augmentation Surgeries
NCT05688293 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Tuberosity Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06650072 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Timing Suture Removal on Root Coverage Procedures
NCT04826653 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extended Platelet- Rich Fibrin Membrane Combined With Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access Technique to Treat Localized Gingival Recession
NCT07079293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA