CLOSE Versus High Density Mapping Guided Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

NCT04466358 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-10-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare two methods of catheter ablation for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The first method being a modified CLOSE protocol used for the control group and the second high density mapping guided isolation of pulmonary veins used for the interventional group. Comparison will be made according to clinical parameters and also durability of pulmonary vein isolation.

Conditions

  • Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Modified CLOSE protocol

Modified CLOSE protocol guided isolation of pulmonary veins.

PROCEDURE

High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolation

Modified CLOSE protocol guided isolation of pulmonary veins with additional ablations at sites of gaps or dormant conduction as evidenced by high density mapping of pulmonary vein antra.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jernej Stublar, MSE · University Medical Centre Ljubljana

  • Bor Antolic, MD, PhD · University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-02-26
Primary Completion
2024-09-01
Completion
2024-10-01

Countries

  • Slovenia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04466358 on ClinicalTrials.gov