MedTrace Logo

The Thermogenic and Metabolic Effects of a Whole Food Meal Versus Its Supplemental Equivalent

NCT04453254 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2024-04-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There is limited research on the amount of calories burned and metabolic differences of a complete supplemental meal in comparison to a whole food meal. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in calories burned and metabolic response post-consumption of a meal consisting of whole foods compared to its nutritionally engineered equivalent. Investigators hypothesize that energy expenditure and satiety will be greater following consumption of the whole food meal compared to the supplement meal, whereas, there will be no difference in levels of glucose between the two conditions.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Whole Food Meal

Isocaloric/ macronutrient whole food meal

OTHER

Supplement Food Meal

Isocaloric/ macronutrient supplement food meal

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Skidmore College

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
24 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-04-15
Primary Completion
2013-05-01
Completion
2013-05-01

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04453254 on ClinicalTrials.gov