Taiwan "Aerosol Box" Versus UMMC "Intubation Box"
NCT04385576 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2020-05-13
Summary
This study compares two intubation boxes, that is the Taiwan "Aerosol Box" versus the UMMC "Intubation Box". The importance of this intubation box has come to light recently in view of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fact that intubation is an aerosol-generating procedure. Risks of the healthcare worker attending to the airway of COVID-19 patients is high and the intubation box aims to minimize that and reduce contamination of the environment. The original design of the "Aerosol Box" has limitations and is not easily used by intubators. This study evaluates the clinical usefulness of an innovation of the "Aerosol Box" design that is made to be more ergonomic and increases the rate of successful intubation. Anaesthetists with more than 5 years of clinical experience in intubating airways as well as more than 20 successful intubations using videolaryngoscopy , will be available to participate. This study will employ manikin and will be a randomized cross-over trial, conducted in UM.
Conditions
- COVID-19
- Airway
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Aerosol Box
Usage of an Intubation Box to minimize intubator and environment contamination during intubation and extubation. Time taken for first-pass success if also expected to be reduced with the usage of the Intubation Box.
- DEVICE
-
Intubation Box
Usage of an Intubation Box to minimize intubator and environment contamination during intubation and extubation. Time taken for first-pass success if also expected to be reduced with the usage of the Intubation Box.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Malaya
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
INA I SHARIFFUDDIN, MAnaes · University of Malaya
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-05-15
- Primary Completion
- 2020-09-15
- Completion
- 2020-12-30
Countries
- Malaysia
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of an Aerosol Protective Intubation Device on Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Difficulty
NCT04865081 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngeal Mask Airway Facilitates a Safe and Smooth Emergence From Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy
NCT05253404 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?
NCT04850976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Location of Laryngeal Mask With Air Leakage Test
NCT04390893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bed up Head Elevated Intubation Position With Glidescope Assisted Tracheal Intubation
NCT03357679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
NCT02210338 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ventilation Efficacy of Size 3 or Size 4 I-gel in Female Patient Weighing 50 to 60 Kilograms
NCT03528590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing the Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT02856672 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Topical Anesthesia With Pressure Nebulized 2% Lidocaine During Awake Intubation
NCT01185535 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of Intubation Rate of Macintosh Size 2 and 3 Blades in Asian Female: a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT04566224 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tongue Root Retractor For Fibroscopic Intubation
NCT04343014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
NCT03887897 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
NCT04286581 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Speaking Valve Combined With Airway Pressure Predicts Upper Airway Patency in Adult Tracheotomized Patients
NCT06521320 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the GMA-TULIP and I-gel Laryngeal Mask for Airway Management in General Anaesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07019961 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Between Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway and Ambu® AuraGain™
NCT03130413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating Optimal Operating Table Height for ProSeal-LMA™ Insertion
NCT04338412 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Lidocaine on Smooth Emergence With Double Lumen Tube
NCT04455711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Predicting Intubation of Patients Hospitalised for Acutely Attacked Asthma
NCT04277078 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
RCT- LMA Supreme™ Versus the Spritztube® Tracheal Cannula in Anesthetized Adult Patients
NCT03443219 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Normal Airway Patients
NCT03108391 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
IntuBrite Versus Macintosh for Endotracheal Intubation in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
NCT05607836 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Foley Airway Stylet Tool on Proseal LMA Insertion
NCT02048657 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Ultrasonographic Skin-to-Epiglottis Distance With Modified Mallampati Versus Modified Mallampati Score Alone in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy During Tracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia
NCT07315256 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT01917409 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA