Comparison Between Connective Graft and Xenogeneic Matrix, in Patients With Multiple Gingival Recessions

NCT03207984 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 37

Last updated 2023-03-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) is considered the gold standard for root coverage treatment. However, it is associated with postoperative morbidity, limited amount of donor tissue, and longer surgical time. Thus, the search for a tissue substitute for SCTG is increasing. Currently, one of the possible autogenous soft tissue substitutes found in the market is the Mucograft® xenogeneic matrix (CM). The results with the use of MC are very promising, both for root coverage as well as for the gain of keratinized tissue. The present study consists of a parallel randomized clinical trial to compare SCTG (control group) and CM (test group) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II gingival recessions, multiple in aesthetic areas (upper central incisors, Lateral and canine).

Conditions

  • Gingival Recession, Generalized

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Root coverage surgery

Periodontal plastic surgery aiming the treatment of multiple gingival recessions in aesthetics areas with SCTG and CM

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Geistlich Pharma AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • University of Sao Paulo

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Raphaella C Michel, PhD · University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-03-08
Primary Completion
2020-09-20
Completion
2021-12-01

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03207984 on ClinicalTrials.gov