MINST Versus Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation In RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT06044727 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 54
Last updated 2025-09-05
Summary
Gingival recession is a common condition and its extent and prevalence increase with age. Majority of patients probably present with localized and shallow gingival recession that need a specific treatment because they are susceptible to further apical displacement of gingival margin. So if gingival recession is detected early, removal of causative factors and non surgical treatments initiated then it can prevent more advanced mucogingival defects. Studies have shown that non surgical periodontal therapy including proper oral hygiene instructions, periodic scaling and root planning obtained successful root coverage in shallow gingival recession. Minimal invasive non surgical periodontal therapy (MINST)uses the delicate instruments and magnifying loupes performing periodontal debridement with more effective calculus and biofilm removal and less soft tissue trauma , maintain the tissue architecture, benefit the healing phase, improve the clinical results and increase visibility. There is no study to evaluate efficacy of MINST versus conventional subgingival instrumentation in the restorative capacity of marginal gingival in RT1 gingival recession , so the present study will be conducted to compare and evaluate the efficacy of minimal invasive non surgical periodontal therapy (MINST) and conventional subgingival instrumentation in the restorative capacity of marginal gingiva involving RT1 gingival recession.
Conditions
- Gingival Recession
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Minimally invasive non surgical periodontal therapy
using Magnifying loupes
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional subgingival instrumentation
Conventional subgingival instrumentation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Anjali Yadav, BDS · Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-09-25
- Primary Completion
- 2025-03-31
- Completion
- 2025-03-31
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype.
NCT06432439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Recession (RT1) Treatment With Different Gingival Augmentation Surgeries
NCT05688293 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of PRF With M-MIST in the Treatment of Intrabony Defects
NCT03169920 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Chorion Membrane With Photobiostimulation ,Chorion Membrane & SCTG in Treating Isolated RT 2 Recession Defects
NCT06433973 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Microneedling and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Thin Periodontal Phenotype
NCT05055765 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect Of Microneedling With Coronally Advanced Flap For Management of RT1 Gingival Recession In Thin Gingival Phenotype
NCT06988839 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Recombinant Human Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 (rhFGF-2) In Gingival Recession Defects
NCT04361630 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Periosteal Pedicle Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Gingival Recession
NCT06529640 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06030947 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Recession Treatment With Concentrated Growth Factor(CGF)
NCT03020732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Laterally Closed Tunnel Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Mandibular Anterior Gingival Recession Defects
NCT04198376 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Coronally Advanced Flap and Semilunar Incision Vestibular Technique for Multiple Gingival Recessions in Maxillary Teeth - A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03037320 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Surgical Technique Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT04356391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Three Gingival Displacement Methods
NCT07282977 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Volume Stable Collagen Matrix in Interdental Papilla Reconstruction in Maxillary Esthetic Region
NCT05576441 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft
NCT06366022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Retraction Cords on the Gingival Margin Level.
NCT05949073 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Tunnel Approach in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT02642887 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recessions with Connective Tissue or Concentrated Growth Factor Membrane Using Tunnel Technique
NCT04561947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Microneedling and CTG for Gingival Augmentation- A RCT
NCT06060119 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Root Coverage Outcomes by NORD Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT05844254 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Enamel Matrix Derivative and Connective Tissue Graft in Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT)
NCT06504329 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Subpithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Tunneling Technique in Treating RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT04104087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Use of Hyaluronic Acid Gel in Intraosseous Defects
NCT06214728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA