Root Coverage With Connective Tissue Graft Associated With VISTA Versus Tunnel Technique
NCT03690635 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2018-10-01
Summary
Several techniques were proposed in the literature to solve the problems associated with gingival recession. Root coverage was mainly indicated for esthetic concern, however, it might also be indicated for treatment of root hypersensitivity and maintaining adequate plaque control by keratinized tissue augmentation.
These proposed surgical techniques were well-documented with successful outcomes. Each technique had its own advantages, disadvantages and indications. Various factors affected the most suitable technique. These factors were either related to the dimensions of gingival recession defect, or related to the surgeon experience or to the patient himself .
Nowadays, the scope of scientific research is concerned with designing surgical techniques that are more predictable, high esthetic, less invasive and patient centered In this way, continuous modification of surgical techniques aroused to result in a more reproducible outcomes; such as the attempt to advance pedicle flaps without vertical releasing incisions, as in the modified coronally advanced flap and the modified microsurgical tunnel technique.
However, controversy still exist in the literature regarding the best technique for root coverage. Coronally advanced flap is the most commonly reported technique in research, with lack of researches on tunneling techniques.
Conditions
- Root Coverage
- Tunneling Technique
- VISTA Technique
- Sub Epithelial Connective Tissue Graft
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
VISTA (vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel acess)
A vertical incision will be made on the mucous membrane and the periosteum with a scalpel. The incision will be 8-10mm long, beginning from the mobile mucosa and reaching the apical end of the keratinized gingiva. A small subperiosteal elevator will be inserted through the incision and is used to free the subperiosteal tunnel flap. The flap includes the tissues of the mobile and immobile mucosa in the area of the affected teeth and about 1 mm distally and medially from them. Subperiosteal tunnel will be extended interproximally under each papilla as far as the embrasure space permits, without making any surface incisions through the papilla. Tunneling instruments will be used through the vertical incision to free the mucosa and the periosteum around the teeth affected by the gingival recession. This is continues at the base of the gingival papillae without affecting their integrity.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
weam battawy, PHD · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-10-10
- Primary Completion
- 2020-09-10
- Completion
- 2021-03-10
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Subpithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Tunneling Technique in Treating RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT04104087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.
NCT03328442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique, for The Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession
NCT06453369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Surgical Technique Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT04356391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Tunnel Approach in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT02642887 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Collagen Matrix With Tunnel Technique Compared to CTG for the Treatment of Periodontal Recessions
NCT02632240 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession.
NCT03213483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Compare Two Commonly Used Soft Tissue Grafting Techniques to Achieve Coronal Flap Advancement and Root Coverage
NCT03566108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
NCT07064603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
NCT06044870 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Vestibular Depth on Predictability of Miller Class III/ RT2 Gingival Recession Coverage
NCT06000228 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02916186 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laterally Closed Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT05823415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation Comparing Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap and Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Connective Tissue Graft for Managing Single Gum Recession
NCT07239180 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions
NCT06755294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Using Collagen Membrane and A-PRF Using VISTA Technique in Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT06357351 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft
NCT06366022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A New Therapeutic Approach for Root Coverage
NCT01143610 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Techniques for Root Coverage With a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix
NCT02129504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Modified Technique for Free Gingival Graft Stabilization Using Titanium Fixation Tacs Around Implants Versus Conventional Suturing Technique
NCT07019428 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Amnion Chorion Membrane in Comparison to Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession Coverage
NCT02656732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Modified VISTA Technique Using ALB-PRF vs CTG in the Treatment of Multiple Miller Class III Recessions
NCT06643507 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Root Coverage After the Use of Coronally Advanced Flap Either With Advanced Paltelet Rich Fibrin or Subepithilial Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession.
NCT03695549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Methods of Covering a Single Lower Front Tooth With Receded Gums
NCT06037161 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Periosteal Tissue Graft vs Collagen Matrix for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Implants: A Comparative Study
NCT06808243 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA