MedTrace Logo

Is HugeMed Video Laryngoscope Superior to McGrath in Pediatric Patients

NCT06484517 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2025-01-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Videolaryngoscopes improve laryngeal visualization in children under 3 years. In this study we aimed to compare Hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscopes regarding their Cormach-Lehane (CL) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores. Furthermore, tracheal intubation success rates, need for cricoid pressure and optimization maneuvers, and hemodynamic changes are compared.

Conditions

  • Difficult Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Hugemed Videolaryngoscope

After general anesthesia induction, the first group of patients (Group M, n=20) was intubated with the McGrath videolaryngoscope. For the second group (Group H, n=20), the Hugemed videolaryngoscope was used. Patients were intubated using one of the appropriate blades numbered 1, 2, or 3 based on their height, weight, and age.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Marmara University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gamze Çabaklı · Marmara University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Months
Max Age
3 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-03-01
Primary Completion
2022-10-01
Completion
2023-01-31

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06484517 on ClinicalTrials.gov