Sedation Versus Protective Stabilization for Pediatric Dental Treatment

NCT04119180 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 152

Last updated 2024-12-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of moderate sedation in pediatric dentistry, compared to protective stabilization, which remains routinely used in the Brazilian context despite moral questions. The objective of this prospective nonrandomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of moderate sedation, compared to the protective stabilization, in the dental care of children with fear / anxiety and / or dental behavior problem, and associated factors. The study will be carried out in outpatient clinics of the Dental Schools of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG) and University of São Paulo (USP), with the support of professors from King's College London through the partnership CEDACORE - Children Experiencing Dental Anxiety: Collaboration on Research and Education. Participants will be 152 children under 7 years of age with dental caries, who need specialized dental treatment due to a history of non-cooperation with dental care. The interventions to be compared are moderate sedation with oral administration of ketamine and midazolam (UFG) and protective stabilization (USP). The primary endpoint 'behavior / anxiety of the child during treatment will be assessed using the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale. The secondary outcomes are: dental behavioral and anxiety evolution of the child, child' pain during procedure, impact on the quality of life related to oral health, parents and dentists' satisfaction and stress, adverse events for sedated participants, longevity of composite and glass ionomer cement restorations, chronotype and physiological stress of these children. A cost-efficacy analysis will be produced at the end of the study from the perspective of the Sistema Único de Saúde. Additionally, at the end of 36 months, the investigators expect to contribute to the identification of psychosocial aspects related to dental behavior problems in children in early childhood. It is important to highlight the perspective of technological innovation, with the creation of a digital platform that will allow the registration of data related to the dental care of children worldwide and favor analyzes in the methodology of data science.

Conditions

  • Child Behavior
  • Dental Caries in Children

Interventions

DRUG

Ketamine 50 MG/ML

Ketamine injectable solution in a concentration of 50.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 4.0 mg/kg maximum 100.0 mg

DRUG

Midazolam Hcl 2Mg/Ml Syrup

Midazolam oral solution in a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 0.5 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg when associated with ketamine;

PROCEDURE

Protective stabilization

The legal guardian or accompanying person appointed by the legal guardian should sit in the dental chair with the child and contain leg and arm movements. A dental assistant keeps the child's head contained during care.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Sao Paulo

    collaborator OTHER
  • King's College London

    collaborator OTHER
  • Universidade Federal de Goias

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Luciane RS Costa, PhD · Universidade Federal de Goias

  • Daniela P Raggio, PhD · University of Sao Paulo

  • Patricia C Faria, PhD · Universidade Federal de Goias

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Year
Max Age
7 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-01-30
Primary Completion
2025-02-28
Completion
2026-02-28

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04119180 on ClinicalTrials.gov