Clinical Evaluation of Internal Fit of Milled BioHPP Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) - Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns
NCT04052789 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16
Last updated 2019-08-13
Summary
All ceramic crowns are indicated in case of mild to moderate discoloration, restoration of traumatized or fractured teeth and abnormal tooth anatomy. The success of dental restorations is determined by four main factors: biocompatibility, aesthetic value, resistance to fracture and marginal adaptation. . An inadequate marginal fit may compromise the longevity of the restoration since cement film exposure to the oral environment can lead to its dissolution . .
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymer that has many potentials uses in dentistry. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) can be used to support fixed dental prostheses. However, information about physio mechanical characterization is still scarce.
Aim of the study:
\- The aim of this study is to evaluate the internal fit of milled BioHPP PEEK-based versus zirconia-based single crowns.
Conditions
- Badly Decayed Teeth andTeeth Restored With Large Filling Restorations and Endodontically Treated Teeth and Malformed Teeth and Malposed Teeth
Interventions
- OTHER
-
BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with composite resin
In the first visit, a Face-to-Face adherence session will be held in which the patient should be informed about the study steps and how to maintain oral hygiene measures. Further sessions will occur at the follow-up visits . Participant patients will be asked about any problems they are having. Patients will be recalled every two months for one year for follow up visits.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-08-01
- Completion
- 2020-08-01
More Related Trials
-
Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06890949 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Prepared With Two Occlusal Designs and Two Ceramic Full Coverage Restorations
NCT06695091 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06933927 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Behavior of Human Enamel and Chipping of Veneered Zirconia Against Monolithic Zirconia
NCT03295513 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Full Veneered Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Crowns Cemented With Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Two Curing Modes
NCT07043998 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) Among a Group of Egyptian Children Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
NCT04369768 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Prefabricated CAD/CAM PEEK Crowns Used in Primary Molars
NCT06583759 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Techniques
NCT06805604 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Nusmile Bioflex Versus Stainless-Steel Crowns in Restoring Decayed Primary Molars with Modified Hall Technique
NCT06721741 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Zirconia Crowns Restoring Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth With Two Finish Line Designs And Occlusal Reduction Schemes
NCT04052490 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Internal Fit Evaluation of Indirect Restorations Using Cone Beam CT (CBCT)
NCT04784676 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06968767 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06856070 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Polymethyl Methacrylate CAD/CAM Crowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06113770 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shade Matching of Universal Versus Conventional Nanohybrid Resin Composites in Class IV Restorations After Bleaching
NCT05638373 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Antagonist Wear Behavior and Patient Satisfaction of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass When Compared to Monolithic Zirconia
NCT03697018 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA