One Year Clinical Evaluation of Pressed BioHPP Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns
NCT03697005 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2018-10-05
Summary
The clinical performance (using the modified Ryge criteria) and patient satisfaction ( using VAS questionnaire) of pressed BioHPP PEEK based posterior single crowns compared to zirconia based crowns are questionable as the peek is considered as a new material and need to be tested for future clinical application.
Conditions
- Clinical Performance
- Patient Satisfaction
Interventions
- OTHER
-
BioHPP PEEK single posterior crowns
BioHPP is a 20% ceramic reinforced, semicrystalline, thermoplastic and radiolucent polymeric material, used for fabrication of high strength fixed and removable prostheses. it has advantages of bio-compatibility, low density, light weight, shock absorption.
- OTHER
-
zirconia-based single posterior crowns
ZrO2, a ceramic material used for medical devices, displays good esthetic appearance, high mechanical strength, and high biocompatibility and is used in a wide range of indications, such as frameworks, implants, and abutments. In addition, it's very good long-term stability and reliability was proven in a 10-year clinical study. These excellent material properties and the transformation behavior are explained by the yttrium oxide stabilization of ZrO2.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-10-01
- Completion
- 2019-11-01
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Behavior of Human Enamel and Chipping of Veneered Zirconia Against Monolithic Zirconia
NCT03295513 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns vs Stainless Steel Crowns
NCT06396195 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06968767 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Translucent Zirconia Crowns in Dental Esthetic Zone With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique (BOPT) Versus Conventional Preparation (Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT04320758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioflex Crowns Endocrowns Compared to Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns on Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT06433141 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Prefabricated CAD/CAM PEEK Crowns Used in Primary Molars
NCT06583759 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Relation Between Oral Hygiene and Microbial Load in the Oral Cavity After Restoring Primary Molars With Two Types of Ready-made Crowns
NCT06767670 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06933927 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06890949 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Color Difference Between Natural Teeth and Monolithic All-ceramic Crowns Fabricated From Celtra Press Treated With Different Surface Finishing Protocols
NCT03813628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Efficiency of Newly Designed Prefabricated PMMA Crowns for Restoring Primary Teeth in Comparison to Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns
NCT04479046 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Polymethyl Methacrylate CAD/CAM Crowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06113770 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpally-treated Primary Molars
NCT04909827 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Efficacy of Preformed Pediatric Zirconia and Metal Crown
NCT05910905 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06856070 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06068244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars.
NCT04620174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Analysis of Primary Teeth Crown Dimensions and Clinical Evaluation in a Sample of Egyptian Children
NCT06874218 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Monolithic CAD/CAM Single Tooth Ceramic Crowns
NCT04474093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Child and Parental Satisfaction of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06897020 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Techniques
NCT06805604 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Highly Filled Injectable Flowable Composite for Direct Posterior Occlusal Conservative Restorations Using FDI Criteria: Two Year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06790511 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Marginal Evaluation of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Restoration of Egyptian Posterior Teeth.
NCT05281861 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA