One Year Clinical Evaluation of Pressed BioHPP Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns

NCT03697005 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2018-10-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The clinical performance (using the modified Ryge criteria) and patient satisfaction ( using VAS questionnaire) of pressed BioHPP PEEK based posterior single crowns compared to zirconia based crowns are questionable as the peek is considered as a new material and need to be tested for future clinical application.

Conditions

  • Clinical Performance
  • Patient Satisfaction

Interventions

OTHER

BioHPP PEEK single posterior crowns

BioHPP is a 20% ceramic reinforced, semicrystalline, thermoplastic and radiolucent polymeric material, used for fabrication of high strength fixed and removable prostheses. it has advantages of bio-compatibility, low density, light weight, shock absorption.

OTHER

zirconia-based single posterior crowns

ZrO2, a ceramic material used for medical devices, displays good esthetic appearance, high mechanical strength, and high biocompatibility and is used in a wide range of indications, such as frameworks, implants, and abutments. In addition, it's very good long-term stability and reliability was proven in a 10-year clinical study. These excellent material properties and the transformation behavior are explained by the yttrium oxide stabilization of ZrO2.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-10-01
Primary Completion
2019-10-01
Completion
2019-11-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03697005 on ClinicalTrials.gov